Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Controversial VAR Decision Sparks Debate in Chelsea's Victory Over Crystal Palace

1/27/2026, 12:08:01 AM

Key Incident: Chelsea Awarded Penalty for Handball

During Chelsea's 3-1 victory over Crystal Palace on Sunday, a pivotal moment occurred when referee Darren England awarded a penalty for a handball by Palace defender Jaydee Canvot. The incident unfolded in the 59th minute when Chelsea forward Joao Pedro's shot struck Canvot's arm, which was in a natural position. Initially, England did not award a penalty, but after a review by the Video Assistant Referee (VAR), he was advised to reconsider the decision. Following a nearly two-minute review, England confirmed the penalty, stating that the handball, although accidental, had prevented a clear goal-scoring opportunity.

Background: Changes to Handball Rules

The decision to award the penalty has drawn attention due to recent changes in the International Football Association Board (IFAB) rules regarding handball. According to the updated regulations, a non-deliberate handball that denies an obvious goal-scoring opportunity can result in a penalty, but only if the handball is deemed an "offence"—meaning the player made their body unnaturally bigger. This clarification has led to confusion among players, officials, and fans alike, particularly in this instance where the handball was not intentional.

Official Statements & Responses

Referee Darren England explained the decision by stating, "It is an accidental handball, therefore it is a penalty, but because it is accidental, it is only a yellow card." This statement was met with mixed reactions, as many in the stadium and on social media expressed confusion over why a penalty was awarded for a non-deliberate handball. Former Premier League assistant referee Darren Cann voiced his disagreement, suggesting that the penalty should not have been given, as the ball appeared to strike Canvot's hip before hitting his arm.

Criticism & Opposition

Crystal Palace manager Oliver Glasner expressed his frustration with the decision, arguing that the ball first touched Canvot's hip, which should negate the penalty according to the rules. He noted, "I watched it now back and the ball touches first the hip. And when it's like this, it's not a penalty." Glasner also highlighted other contentious decisions during the match, suggesting that his team faced a series of unfavorable calls.

Match Outcome and Implications

Chelsea's victory marked a significant moment in their season, as they secured their third goal from the penalty taken by Enzo Fernandez. The win improved Chelsea's standing under new manager Liam Rosenior, while Crystal Palace's struggles continued, marking their eleventh game without a win. The match also highlighted the ongoing debate surrounding VAR and its implementation in the Premier League, as fans and analysts alike grapple with the complexities of the updated handball rules.

What's Next

Chelsea will next face Napoli in a Champions League match, aiming to solidify their position in the knockout stages. Meanwhile, Crystal Palace will seek to regroup before their upcoming fixture against Nottingham Forest, hoping to turn their fortunes around after a challenging season.