Story perspectives

Judge Questions Legality of Trump’s Metro Surge Operation

1/27/2026

Summary

Story summary

U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez reviews a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's Operation Metro Surge in Minnesota.
During a hearing, Menendez expressed skepticism about the government's justification for the operation.
She flagged a letter by Attorney General Pam Bondi criticizing Minnesota sanctuary policies and demanding access to state records.
Menendez questioned the relevance of Bondi's demands to immigration enforcement and has not ruled on the state's restraining order request.

History

Historical Context

In 2017, the Trump administration initiated Operation Metro Surge to enhance immigration enforcement in urban areas, notably Minnesota. This operation sparked significant backlash, with Minnesota officials, including Attorney General Keith Ellison, condemning it as a federal invasion. Legal disputes arose, echoing the 2012 Supreme Court case Arizona v. United States, highlighting ongoing tensions between federal immigration policies and state rights.

1 of 2

Story summary

U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez reviews a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's Operation Metro Surge in Minnesota.
During a hearing, Menendez expressed skepticism about the government's justification for the operation.
She flagged a letter by Attorney General Pam Bondi criticizing Minnesota sanctuary policies and demanding access to state records.
Menendez questioned the relevance of Bondi's demands to immigration enforcement and has not ruled on the state's restraining order request.

1 / 2