Tensions Surround Singapore's "We First" Society Initiative

Recent remarks by Singapore’s Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong regarding the concept of a "we first" society have ignited controversy among locals. This initiative, which emphasizes collective identity and inclusivity, was initially introduced by Prime Minister Lawrence Wong during his National Day Rally last year. Wong highlighted the need for Singaporeans to unite in shaping the nation’s future.

Who are ‘we’? Why some Singaporeans bristle at ‘we first’ inclusive society call

During a dialogue at the Institute of Policy Studies’ 2026 Singapore Perspectives conference, Gan addressed concerns raised by a polytechnic student about the potential exclusion of Singaporeans in favor of foreigners. He clarified that the "we first" philosophy does not imply prioritizing foreigners over citizens but rather promotes a collective approach where the focus is on community rather than individualism. Gan stated, “we before I,” emphasizing that the initiative is about collective responsibility, which includes supporting foreigners such as migrant domestic workers.

Who are ‘we’? Why some Singaporeans bristle at ‘we first’ inclusive society call

The "we first" concept aims to foster a sense of belonging and cooperation among Singaporeans and foreigners alike. Gan's comments reflect a broader governmental effort to redefine national identity in a multicultural society. However, experts suggest that achieving this vision requires significant cultural shifts and enhanced cooperation among citizens.

Who are ‘we’? Why some Singaporeans bristle at ‘we first’ inclusive society call

Despite the government's intentions, some Singaporeans have expressed skepticism regarding the "we first" initiative. Critics argue that the emphasis on inclusivity may inadvertently marginalize local citizens, leading to fears of foreign influence in national matters. This sentiment underscores a tension between the desire for a cohesive society and the apprehension about losing local identity.

Who are ‘we’? Why some Singaporeans bristle at ‘we first’ inclusive society call

In response to the backlash, Gan reiterated that the "we first" approach is not divisive but rather aims to cultivate a more inclusive society. He highlighted the importance of collective responsibility and the role of Singaporeans in supporting their foreign counterparts. Acting Minister for Culture, Community and Youth David Neo also acknowledged the challenges of building this society, noting that the primary obstacles lie in changing interpersonal relationships rather than in legislative or resource-based limitations.

Who are ‘we’? Why some Singaporeans bristle at ‘we first’ inclusive society call

The ongoing dialogue surrounding the "we first" initiative indicates that discussions about national identity and inclusivity will continue to evolve. As the government seeks to engage citizens in this conversation, it remains to be seen how these efforts will shape public perception and policy in Singapore.

Who are ‘we’? Why some Singaporeans bristle at ‘we first’ inclusive society call

• “The difference is it’s not about me and myself alone, but about us, together collectively…” — Gan Kim Yong, Deputy Prime Minister

Who are ‘we’? Why some Singaporeans bristle at ‘we first’ inclusive society call

• “It’s not a divisive approach, more a collective and inclusive approach to look at ‘we first’, rather than ‘I first’.” — Gan Kim Yong, Deputy Prime Minister

Who are ‘we’? Why some Singaporeans bristle at ‘we first’ inclusive society call