Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Washington State's House Bill 2250: Addressing Charity Care for Non-Residents

1/31/2026, 1:30:36 AM

Overview of House Bill 2250

House Bill 2250, introduced by Representative Andrew Engell, R-Colville, aims to amend Washington state's charity care rules, which currently require hospitals to provide non-emergency charity care without regard to residency. This change follows a recent policy shift that allowed non-residents to access charity care, raising concerns about the potential for Washington to become a "medical tourism destination." The bill seeks to restore previous limitations, ensuring that non-emergency charity care is primarily available to state residents.

Implications of Current Charity Care Policies

Under the existing framework, Washington hospitals provided $483 million in charity care in 2022, with costs increasing due to a surge in demand from out-of-state patients. Critics argue that this expanded requirement for charity care is being exploited, leading to higher costs for paying patients. The bill proposes to limit non-emergency charity care to Washington residents, while still ensuring that emergency services remain accessible to all, regardless of residency.

Key Support and Opposition

Supporters of HB 2250, including Elizabeth New from the Washington Policy Center, argue that the bill is a necessary step to manage healthcare costs effectively. They contend that unrestricted access to charity care for non-residents ultimately burdens local taxpayers and increases healthcare costs for residents. New emphasized that charity care is not "free," as the costs are often shifted to insured patients through higher premiums and service charges.

Conversely, opponents of the bill express concern that it would restrict access to essential healthcare services for non-residents who travel to Washington specifically for medical treatment. They argue that limiting charity care could exacerbate healthcare disparities and make it more difficult for individuals in need to receive timely care.

Official Statements & Responses

The Washington Policy Center has publicly supported HB 2250, stating that the current charity care model is unsustainable and leads to increased costs for residents. They advocate for a return to a policy that prioritizes local residents while maintaining emergency care access for all.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Charity care increases the cost of care, and that cost is often passed on to consumers who pay for services or who are insured.” — Elizabeth New, Director, Washington Policy Center
  • “Health care cannot be made more affordable for people in Washington state if hospitals are required to serve people from anywhere on a routine basis.” — Elizabeth New, Director, Washington Policy Center

What's Next

As HB 2250 progresses through the legislative process, its implications for both residents and non-residents will continue to be debated. The bill's potential passage could reshape how charity care is administered in Washington, impacting healthcare access and costs for various populations.