Full Breakdown
Debate Erupts Over Alex Honnold's Taipei 101 Ascent
1/31/2026, 10:19:50 PM
The Core Event: Honnold's Historic Climb
On January 24, 2026, rock climber Alex Honnold achieved a significant milestone by becoming the first person to free solo climb Taipei 101, a 1,667-foot skyscraper in Taiwan, without using ropes or safety equipment. This climb was broadcast live on Netflix as part of the special "Skyscraper Live." Honnold's ascent has sparked debate within the climbing community regarding the legitimacy of his claim to the title of the world's biggest urban free solo, particularly in light of criticisms from fellow climber Dan Goodwin.
Criticism & Opposition: Goodwin's Challenge
Dan Goodwin, known for his 1986 record-breaking free solo ascent of the CN Tower, has publicly challenged Honnold's claim. Goodwin argues that Honnold's use of cables during his ascent of Taipei 101 disqualifies him from holding the title of the highest urban free solo. In a statement, Goodwin emphasized that he instructed Guinness World Records to stop measuring height at the top of the glass elevator shaft during his own climb, considering any ascent beyond that point as aid climbing. He stated, “The moment my fingers wrapped around the cable to ascend the blank concrete, the ‘free solo’ ended.” Goodwin has formally invited Honnold to debate the rules and ethics governing free solo climbing.
Official Statements & Responses
While Honnold has not publicly responded to Goodwin's challenge, his ascent has been celebrated as a remarkable achievement in the climbing community. Corey Rich, a climber and photographer who assisted Honnold in preparing for the climb, noted that Honnold prioritized safety while balancing the visual demands of the live broadcast. Rich remarked, “Alex makes the final decision... he knows his capabilities and he is willing to speak up.”
Background & Context: The Climbing Landscape
Honnold's climb of Taipei 101 follows a legacy of urban climbing, with French climber Alain Robert being the first to scale the building in 2004 using ropes and safety equipment. Robert's ascent took nearly four hours, while Honnold completed his climb in just over an hour and a half, effectively halving Robert's time. Honnold's climb is distinct not only for its lack of safety gear but also for the unique challenges posed by the skyscraper's design, which differs significantly from natural rock faces.
Why It Matters: Implications for Urban Climbing
The debate surrounding Honnold's ascent raises important questions about the definitions and standards within the climbing community. As urban climbing gains popularity, the distinctions between free soloing and aid climbing become increasingly significant. Goodwin's challenge to Honnold highlights the ongoing discourse about what constitutes a legitimate climbing achievement, particularly in the context of televised events that may influence public perception.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
While Honnold's ascent has been widely celebrated, the climbing community remains divided on the implications of his methods. Goodwin's assertion that Honnold's use of cables constitutes aid climbing contrasts with the broader public perception of Honnold's feat as a groundbreaking achievement. The absence of Honnold's response to Goodwin's challenge leaves a gap in the ongoing discussion about the ethics and standards of free solo climbing.
Verbatim Quotes
- “Reflecting on it now, and watching the footage, I realize why I didn’t include the concrete cable section above the glass elevator shaft: I considered that aid. And so should Alex. Alex, please watch the video of your ascent. If this were a World Cup or the Olympics, the judges would rule that your high point is where your actual free soloing stopped—where you waved to spectators after ascending the final dragon.” — Dan Goodwin, Climber
- “At the end of the day, Alex makes the final decision,” — Corey Rich, Climber and Photographer
- “What a beautiful way to see Taipei,” — Alex Honnold, upon reaching the summit of Taipei 101.
