Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Financial Implications of Staff Cuts at the U.S. Department of Education

2/2/2026, 9:08:58 PM

Overview of the Costly Layoffs

A report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) reveals that the Trump administration's attempt to reduce staff at the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) incurred costs exceeding $28 million. This initiative aimed to terminate over half of OCR's civil rights attorneys and staff, which Education Secretary Linda McMahon described as a move towards "efficiency" and "accountability." However, the reduction-in-force (RIF) was halted by court intervention, leading to 247 employees being placed on administrative leave for nearly nine months while still receiving salaries.

Financial Analysis and Recommendations

The GAO's investigation highlighted that the Education Department failed to provide a comprehensive accounting of the costs associated with the RIF. Consequently, GAO analysts estimated the financial impact based on employee salaries and benefits, arriving at a cost between $28.5 million and $38 million. The report urged the department to conduct a thorough analysis of the RIF's financial implications, a recommendation that Kimberly Richey, the head of OCR appointed by Trump, dismissed as "moot" since the RIF notices were eventually rescinded.

Changes in Complaint Resolution Practices

The GAO report also noted a significant shift in how OCR handled discrimination complaints during the Trump administration. From March to September, OCR resolved over 7,000 complaints, with approximately 90% dismissed without further investigation. This dismissal rate is notably higher than the 81% observed during the 2019-20 school year and the 49% rate under the Obama administration in 2010-11. Following Trump's second inauguration in 2025, OCR did not reach any resolution agreements in cases of school-based sexual harassment or assault, contrasting sharply with the more than 30 agreements made in 2017.

Criticism of OCR's Performance

Critics have expressed concern over the declining effectiveness of OCR under the Trump administration. Beth Gellman-Beer, a former OCR official, noted her confusion regarding the lack of resolution agreements for sexual harassment and assault cases, which were prioritized during Trump's first term. The stark decrease in resolved cases raises questions about the department's commitment to civil rights enforcement.

Official Statements and Future Actions

Education officials indicated to GAO that they had conducted an analysis of the RIF's costs but communicated the results orally to the Office of Management and Budget. The Education Department is expected to report to Congress within 180 days regarding its stance on GAO's recommendations. The future of OCR and its staffing levels remains uncertain, as the department could potentially reduce its workforce to just 10% of its original size if all proposed cuts are implemented.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “there were 247 people on administrative leave from OCR who were being paid while not being allowed to work,” — Jackie Nowicki, GAO Lead Investigator
  • “We do not concur with the recommendation,” — Kimberly Richey, Head of OCR
  • “I'm really befuddled by that,” — Beth Gellman-Beer, Former OCR Official

This analysis underscores the financial and operational ramifications of the Trump administration's staffing decisions at the U.S. Department of Education, particularly within the Office for Civil Rights, and raises critical questions about the future of civil rights enforcement in education.