Full Breakdown
Maryland Moves to End 287(g) Agreements with ICE
2/4/2026, 8:17:00 AM
Legislative Action Against ICE Partnerships
The Maryland House and Senate have both passed legislation aimed at terminating 287(g) agreements, which allow local law enforcement agencies to collaborate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in immigration enforcement. The bills prohibit state employees and agencies from entering into new agreements and mandate the termination of existing ones. Currently, eight counties in Maryland—Allegany, Carroll, Cecil, Frederick, Garrett, Harford, St. Mary’s, and Washington—participate in these agreements, which enable local police to inquire about immigration status during arrests and assist in immigration enforcement.
Background and Context
The push to end 287(g) agreements comes amid heightened scrutiny of immigration enforcement practices, particularly under the Trump administration, which has intensified its crackdown on undocumented immigrants. Advocacy groups, such as CASA, have voiced strong support for the legislation, arguing that these agreements contribute to racial profiling and undermine community trust in law enforcement.
Key Figures and Perspectives
Senate President Bill Ferguson (D-Baltimore City) and Delegate Nicole Williams (D-Prince George’s County) are among the primary sponsors of the legislation. Ferguson has emphasized that the bills reflect Maryland's values and aim to enhance community safety. Williams argued that counties without 287(g) agreements function effectively, allowing residents to engage with law enforcement without fear. Conversely, opponents, including Harford County Sheriff Jeff Gahler, contend that eliminating these agreements could jeopardize public safety by allowing undocumented individuals arrested for other offenses to remain in the community.
Official Statements and Responses
While Governor Wes Moore has criticized ICE for its enforcement tactics, he has not yet committed to signing the legislation into law. His press secretary did not provide comments following the bills' passage. Ferguson noted that the governor's stance remains unclear, and he has not received indications regarding Moore's plans. Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown has raised concerns about the enforceability of the mask ban included in the legislation, suggesting it may face constitutional challenges.
Criticism and Opposition
Debate over the bills has been contentious, with both Democrats and Republicans expressing strong opinions. Delegate Bernice Mireku-North (D-Montgomery County) referred to ICE's tactics as “a weapon of white supremacy,” prompting pushback from Delegate Matt Morgan (R-St. Mary’s County), who defended ICE agents. Critics argue that 287(g) agreements provide a necessary framework for local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration authorities, ensuring that undocumented immigrants in custody can be appropriately handled.
What's Next
The legislation must be approved by the opposite chambers before heading to Governor Moore's desk. If signed, the ban on 287(g) agreements would take effect immediately, reflecting a significant shift in Maryland's approach to immigration enforcement. The outcome of this legislative effort could have lasting implications for local law enforcement practices and community relations in the state.
