Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Diversity Initiatives in Britain's National Parks: A Response to Perceptions of Exclusivity

2/4/2026, 12:56:15 PM

Overview of the Initiative

In response to a government-commissioned review, authorities overseeing Britain's national parks are implementing outreach programs aimed at increasing ethnic diversity among visitors. The review, conducted by Julian Glover and commissioned by the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), highlighted that rural areas are perceived as predominantly "white" and unwelcoming to ethnic minority communities. The report emphasized that the countryside often feels like an exclusive space for white, middle-class individuals, which can deter diverse visitors.

Key Findings from the Review

The Glover review pointed out that the governance of protected landscapes does not reflect the diversity of the population, with a significant majority of board members being male and lacking representation from black, Asian, and minority ethnic groups. The report stated, "We are all paying for national landscapes through our taxes, and yet sometimes on our visits it has felt as if National Parks are an exclusive, mainly white, mainly middle-class club."

Planned Outreach and Engagement Strategies

In light of these findings, various national landscapes, including the Chilterns, Cotswolds, and Malvern Hills, are developing management plans to attract a broader demographic. For instance, the Chilterns National Landscape plans to launch targeted outreach programs in Luton and High Wycombe, areas with significant Muslim populations. Other landscapes, such as Nidderdale in North Yorkshire, are addressing concerns about how ethnic minority visitors may be received in rural settings.

Criticism of the Initiative

Critics, including Michael McManus from the Henry Jackson Society, argue that the government's focus on the "whiteness" of the countryside is a misallocation of resources, especially during times of economic strain. McManus stated, "At a time of low growth, high taxes and stretched public services, it’s astonishing that ministers are spending time and money worrying about the ‘whiteness’ of the countryside."

Barriers to Access

The review and subsequent plans also identified practical barriers that deter ethnic minority visitors, such as concerns about unleashed dogs in rural areas and a lack of generational connection to the countryside. The Malvern Hills National Landscape noted that many minority communities have historically felt unwelcome in these spaces, which has contributed to a lack of familiarity and comfort.

Broader Implications and Future Directions

The initiatives signal a shift in how Britain's publicly funded countryside is managed, reflecting a growing pressure to demonstrate cultural relevance in a changing society. However, there are concerns that this focus on diversity may sideline traditional conservation goals and economic priorities. As these plans are rolled out, landscape authorities will need to balance inclusivity with the preservation of natural heritage and the interests of existing visitors.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “The countryside is seen by both black, Asian and minority ethnic groups and white people as very much a ‘white’ environment,” — Julian Glover, Author of the Review
  • “We are all paying for national landscapes through our taxes, and yet sometimes on our visits it has felt as if National Parks are an exclusive, mainly white, mainly middle class club,” — Julian Glover, Author of the Review
  • “At a time of low growth, high taxes and stretched public services, it’s astonishing that ministers are spending time and money worrying about the ‘whiteness’ of the countryside. Government exists to grow the economy and fix real problems, not to indulge in culture war distractions that deliver nothing for working people.” — Michael McManus, Director of Research at the Henry Jackson Society

The ongoing efforts to diversify Britain's national parks reflect a significant cultural shift, aiming to make these spaces more inclusive while navigating the complexities of public sentiment and resource allocation.