AIPAC's Strategy Backfires in New Jersey Democratic Primary

The Democratic primary in New Jersey's 11th Congressional District has emerged as a significant political event, particularly due to the involvement of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and its super PAC, the United Democracy Project (UDP). AIPAC's decision to spend over $2 million targeting former Congressman Tom Malinowski, a moderate Democrat, has resulted in unexpected consequences, with progressive candidate Analilia Mejia currently leading the race. The primary was held to fill the seat vacated by Governor Mikie Sherrill, and the results are still being finalized, but Mejia's rise signals a shift in party dynamics regarding Israel.

AIPAC fails its first test in the midtermsAIPAC allies picked a candidate to target in New Jersey. They may have boosted a stronger critic of IsraelHow a pro-Israel super PAC made a losing bet to open Democratic primary season‘It’s pissing people off’: Centrist Democrats are livid with AIPAC after primary fiascoUDP says it ‘anticipated’ potential New Jersey bust, eyes further spending in districtFar-left candidate leads New Jersey race after AIPAC campaigns against her pro-Israel rivalAIPAC's Blunder and Other Post-Special Primary MusingsAIPAC faces test in N.J. primary as group maintains aggressive playbookFar-left candidate holding on to lead in NJ primary, as AIPAC strategy appears to backfire

AIPAC's strategy aimed to bolster a more pro-Israel candidate by attacking Malinowski, who had previously expressed openness to conditioning U.S. aid to Israel. Instead of focusing on his record regarding Israel, UDP's ads criticized Malinowski for his past votes on immigration enforcement and stock trading, issues that resonated negatively with voters. This approach has been described as a miscalculation by several political analysts and Democratic strategists, who argue that it inadvertently strengthened Mejia's campaign.

AIPAC steps on a rake in New JerseyHow a pro-Israel super PAC made a losing bet to open Democratic primary seasonFar-left candidate leads New Jersey race after AIPAC campaigns against her pro-Israel rivalPro-Israel lobby group pressures ‘moderate’ US Democrat in new strategyAIPAC faces test in N.J. primary as group maintains aggressive playbookAIPAC's Blunder and Other Post-Special Primary MusingsAIPAC allies picked a candidate to target in New Jersey. They may have boosted a stronger critic of IsraelAIPAC fails its first test in the midtermsAIPAC Donors Flood Last-Minute New Jersey House Pick With Cash

Analilia Mejia, a political organizer and former political director for Senator Bernie Sanders, has positioned herself as a strong critic of Israel's actions in Gaza, even labeling them as genocide. Her campaign has gained traction among voters who are increasingly skeptical of unconditional support for Israel, reflecting a broader trend within the Democratic Party. Mejia's endorsements from prominent progressives, including Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have further solidified her standing in the race.

AIPAC allies picked a candidate to target in New Jersey. They may have boosted a stronger critic of Israel

The backlash against AIPAC's spending has been notable among centrist Democrats. Former Congressman Malinowski remarked that AIPAC's tactics send a clear message demanding "100 percent fealty" from Democratic candidates. He expressed concern that the group's actions could alienate moderate Democrats and push the party further left. Additionally, Democratic strategist Matt Bennett characterized AIPAC's intervention as "one of the greatest own-goals in American political history."

AIPAC allies picked a candidate to target in New Jersey. They may have boosted a stronger critic of Israel

Polling indicates a growing skepticism among Democratic voters regarding Israel's military actions, particularly following the recent conflict in Gaza. An AP-NORC poll revealed that 71% of Democrats believe Israel's response to Hamas has gone too far, a significant increase from previous years. This shift in sentiment is reflected in the primary results, where Mejia's progressive platform has resonated with a constituency increasingly critical of AIPAC's influence.

How a pro-Israel super PAC made a losing bet to open Democratic primary season

The outcome of this primary could have lasting implications for the Democratic Party as it heads into the 2026 election cycle. The winner will face Republican candidate Joe Hathaway in a special election on April 16, followed by a regular primary in June for the full term. AIPAC has indicated it will continue to monitor and potentially invest in upcoming races, but its recent experience in New Jersey may prompt a reevaluation of its strategies moving forward.

‘It’s pissing people off’: Centrist Democrats are livid with AIPAC after primary fiasco

• “What AIPAC did in this race is bad for Jews, bad for Israel, and bad for having bipartisan congressional support for the very issues AIPAC claims to care about.” — Julie Roginsky, Democratic Strategist

Far-left candidate leads New Jersey race after AIPAC campaigns against her pro-Israel rival

• “First and foremost, this election was a clear rejection of AIPAC by Democratic voters,” — Usamah Andrabi, Communications Director, Justice Democrats

AIPAC allies picked a candidate to target in New Jersey. They may have boosted a stronger critic of Israel

• “If these assholes get away with doing this to me, they will do it to every Democrat they want to target in the country in the midterms,” — Tom Malinowski, Former Congressman

AIPAC steps on a rake in New Jersey

While Mejia currently leads the primary, the final vote count is still pending, with mail-in ballots yet to be processed. The exact implications of AIPAC's spending on future Democratic primaries remain uncertain, as the party grapples with internal divisions over its stance on Israel.

Far-left candidate holding on to lead in NJ primary, as AIPAC strategy appears to backfire