Nanjing Museum Scandal: Uncovering Decades of Mismanagement and Corruption

A high-profile investigation into the Nanjing Museum in Jiangsu province has revealed systemic mismanagement and alleged corruption spanning decades, leading to the illegal sale of national treasures. The scandal erupted in December 2025 when a Ming dynasty painting, *Jiangnan Spring*, surfaced at an auction with an estimated value of 88 million yuan (approximately $12.5 million). This painting was part of a collection of 137 artworks donated to the museum by the family of collector Pang Laichen in 1959, intended for preservation. Following a court-ordered inventory check in June 2025, several of these artworks were found missing, prompting further scrutiny.

South China Morning PostProbe Finds Major Art Mismanagement at China’s Nanjing MuseumChina Daily

The investigation, guided by the National Cultural Heritage Administration, involved extensive inquiries across 12 provinces, including interviews with over 1,100 individuals and the review of 65,000 documents. It identified significant procedural violations by former museum officials, particularly Xu Huping, the museum's former executive vice-director. Xu was found to have improperly approved the transfer of several donated paintings to a state-owned cultural relics store for sale, violating established regulations.

China DailyProbe Finds Major Art Mismanagement at China’s Nanjing MuseumSouth China Morning Post

The probe uncovered that *Jiangnan Spring* was sold in 1997 for 2,250 yuan after its price was altered, later changing hands multiple times before being identified by Pang's great-granddaughter, Pang Shuling, at the auction. Two other paintings were recovered by the end of 2025, while a fourth was located in the museum's repository. However, one painting remains missing.

Probe Finds Major Art Mismanagement at China’s Nanjing Museum

The investigation implicated 29 individuals, with 24 facing legal and disciplinary actions, while five have since died. The Jiangsu provincial government has initiated proceedings against the Nanjing Museum for violations of cultural relic regulations. Investigators have urged for a comprehensive overhaul of the museum's management and the establishment of a social oversight committee to enhance transparency and security.

China Daily

In a public apology, the Nanjing Museum acknowledged its systemic management failures and improper conduct in handling the donated artworks, which violated the trust of the donor and harmed the family's reputation. The museum committed to improving its internal procedures, implementing new donation rules, and enhancing public supervision to restore credibility.

China Daily

Critics have raised concerns about the broader implications of this scandal, particularly regarding the management of cultural artifacts in state-run institutions. The investigation's findings have sparked public mistrust in museum management, coinciding with Beijing's efforts to promote China as a cultural superpower.

China Daily

Moving forward, the Jiangsu Provincial Department of Culture and Tourism is expected to enforce stricter regulations and oversight mechanisms to prevent similar incidents. The museum's commitment to reform will be closely monitored as it seeks to regain public trust and ensure the protection of cultural heritage.

China Daily

• “They illegally approved the transfer of cultural relics and sold them without authorization, resulting in severe social repercussions that necessitate strict action.” — Jiangsu Provincial Authorities

China Daily

• “The case is considered the most high-profile art scandal in recent years.” — State Broadcaster CCTV

Probe Finds Major Art Mismanagement at China’s Nanjing Museum