Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Tensions Rise Between Netanyahu and Former Shin Bet Leaders Over October 7 Attacks

2/13/2026, 9:38:47 PM

Unprecedented Criticism of Prime Minister Netanyahu

A public letter issued by several retired Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) chiefs and 31 former department heads has condemned Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his comments regarding former Shin Bet head Ronen Bar. The letter expresses astonishment at the silence of the current Shin Bet chief, David Zini, in response to what the signatories describe as "unprecedented attacks" on Bar and other security personnel who served during the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led assault. The former officials argue that Netanyahu's remarks and the surrounding conspiracy theories undermine the integrity of the security establishment.

Netanyahu's Defense and Allegations

In the aftermath of the October 7 attacks, Netanyahu has faced criticism for allegedly misrepresenting the intelligence community's actions leading up to the event. He presented a 55-page document to the State Comptroller, which included selected quotes from internal discussions prior to the attacks, suggesting he had sought decisive action against Hamas. Critics, including the former Shin Bet leaders, assert that this document is part of an effort by Netanyahu to deflect responsibility for the intelligence failures and to preempt calls for a state commission of inquiry into the events of that day.

Calls for Accountability

The letter from the former Shin Bet officials demands a strong response from Zini against the attacks on public service employees and the spread of false conspiracies. It highlights that while Bar and other security leaders took responsibility and resigned following the attacks, Netanyahu has consistently sought to absolve himself of any accountability. The signatories emphasize the need for a comprehensive investigation into the circumstances surrounding the October 7 massacre, arguing that the proposed "national-state commission of inquiry" lacks the independence necessary for a fair assessment.

Conflicting Perspectives on Inquiry

Opposition figures, government watchdog groups, and families of former hostages have called for a genuine state commission to investigate the October 7 attacks. They argue that the government's proposed commission, which would allow Netanyahu and his coalition to select its members, compromises the integrity of the inquiry process. In contrast, Netanyahu's administration has resisted establishing a state commission, claiming it would be biased against the government due to the judiciary's involvement.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “We express astonishment at the silence of the head of the Shin Bet, David Zini, in light of the unprecedented slander against former head of the service, Ronen Bar, and managers, fighters, and employees who served in the organization on 7/10, from the Prime Minister's entourage and members of the coalition,” — Former Shin Bet Chiefs
  • “members of the security establishment, led by Ronen Bar, the head of the Shin Bet, and Herzi Halevi, the IDF chief of staff, took responsibility and resigned. The only one who has consistently acted to absolve himself of any responsibility is Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with the assistance of his coalition partners.” — Letter from Former Shin Bet Officials
  • “are part of attempts by the prime minister, with assistance from his mouthpieces, to distance himself from all responsibility over October 7 and are designed to condition the audience, mainly his ‘base,’ that there is no need for a state commission of inquiry, which, the guilty parties have already signaled,” — Letter from Former Shin Bet Officials
  • “After the rebellion they led ended in the most terrible disaster in the history of the state, they added sin to crime and embarked on a campaign of covering up, falsifying, and rewriting history,” — Erez Tadmor, Former Likud Spokesman

Conclusion

The ongoing conflict between Netanyahu and former Shin Bet leaders highlights significant tensions within Israel's security establishment following the October 7 attacks. As calls for accountability and independent investigations grow louder, the political landscape remains fraught with accusations and counter-accusations, complicating the path forward for both the government and the security agencies involved.