Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Investigation Launched into DHS Officers Following Migrant Shooting Incident

2/14/2026, 3:26:21 AM

Overview of the Incident

Two officers from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have been placed on administrative leave and may face criminal charges after allegedly providing false statements regarding a shooting incident involving a Venezuelan migrant in Minneapolis on January 14, 2026. The incident began with a traffic stop that escalated into a chase, during which an officer shot the migrant, Julio Sosa-Celis, in the leg. The initial DHS account claimed that Sosa-Celis had violently assaulted the officer, prompting the use of force.

Details of the Shooting

According to the DHS, after a traffic stop, Sosa-Celis allegedly crashed into a parked car and fled on foot. The agency's narrative described a struggle between the officer and Sosa-Celis, during which two other migrants, Alfredo Alejandro Aljorna and Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, allegedly attacked the officer with a snow shovel and broom handle. The officer, fearing for his safety, fired a shot that struck Sosa-Celis. Following the incident, both Aljorna and Sosa-Celis were initially charged with assaulting law enforcement but had those charges dismissed by a federal judge due to inconsistencies in the evidence presented.

Official Statements & Responses

Todd Lyons, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), stated that the officers involved made "untruthful statements" under oath, leading to their immediate administrative leave. Lyons emphasized the seriousness of lying under oath, noting that the U.S. Attorney's Office is investigating the matter, which could result in termination and criminal prosecution for the officers. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem had previously defended the actions of the officers, asserting that they were acting within the law during the incident.

Criticism & Opposition

The dismissal of charges against Aljorna and Sosa-Celis has drawn criticism from various quarters. Brian D. Clark, the defense attorney for the men, claimed that the charges were based on falsehoods propagated by an ICE agent. He called for the identity of the officer who shot Sosa-Celis to be made public and for that officer to face charges. The incident has also sparked backlash against the surge of immigration officers in Minnesota, with public sentiment largely opposing the aggressive tactics employed by ICE.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

There are discrepancies between the accounts provided by DHS and the evidence reviewed by the DOJ. While DHS initially portrayed the incident as a violent confrontation, subsequent investigations revealed that the testimony from the officers was inconsistent with video evidence. The DOJ's withdrawal of charges against Aljorna and Sosa-Celis indicates significant gaps in the prosecution's case.

What's Next

The ongoing internal investigation into the officers' conduct will determine the next steps, including potential disciplinary actions and criminal charges. The situation has raised broader questions about the accountability of law enforcement agencies and the treatment of migrants in the U.S. immigration system.