Story perspectives

Sweden's Eriksson Accuses Canada’s Kennedy in Curling Controversy

2/15/2026

Center

Eriksson Accuses Kennedy

During a Winter Olympics curling match in Italy, Sweden's Oskar Eriksson accused Canadian Marc Kennedy of "double-touching" the stone, sparking a profanity-laden exchange.
Kennedy defended himself, stating he has never cheated in his 25-year career.
World Curling issued a verbal warning to Kennedy for his language but found no formal wrongdoing.
The controversy prompted online debate after footage appeared to show a potential rule violation.

Left

Curling Couples Compete

During the Winter Olympics in Italy, mixed doubles curling showed how relationships affect performance for Norway's Magnus Nedregotten and Kristin Skaslien.
The Canadian team escaped punishment after a heated match against Sweden for alleged rule violations.
American fans passionately supported their team, drawing mixed reactions from international spectators.
As the competition progressed, athletes balanced personal relationships with competitive drive, highlighting the blend of love and sport at the Games.

History

Historical Context

The 2006 Winter Olympics in Turin, Italy, highlighted ongoing tensions in curling, echoing controversies from the 1998 Nagano Games. The World Curling Federation, established in 1991, oversees the sport, which became an official Olympic event in 1998. Accusations of rule violations during the Turin Games prompted discussions about fair play, emphasizing the need for organizations to uphold the integrity of competitive sports.

1 of 3

Eriksson Accuses Kennedy

During a Winter Olympics curling match in Italy, Sweden's Oskar Eriksson accused Canadian Marc Kennedy of "double-touching" the stone, sparking a profanity-laden exchange.
Kennedy defended himself, stating he has never cheated in his 25-year career.
World Curling issued a verbal warning to Kennedy for his language but found no formal wrongdoing.
The controversy prompted online debate after footage appeared to show a potential rule violation.

1 / 3