1 of 1
Story summary
- Betting on a WNBA player's menstrual cycles has drawn scrutiny as gamblers use cycle data to predict performance.
- FadeMeBets claims a 68.75% accuracy rate in cycle-based predictions and does not consult players about their cycles.
- Attendance this season has surpassed 2.5 million, increasing league visibility amid the discussion.
- Experts criticize the approach as pseudoscientific and note that menstrual cycles vary widely.
