Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Opposition to Jewish Psychologists' Group Sparks Controversy

2/16/2026, 2:20:40 AM

Coalition's Opposition Statement

The Coalition of National Racial and Ethnic Psychological Associations has publicly opposed the formation of the Association of Jewish Psychologists, arguing that Jewish psychologists are not underrepresented within the American Psychological Association (APA). The coalition, which includes organizations such as the Asian American Psychological Association and the National Latinx Psychological Association, cited the predominance of Jewish Americans identifying as white and stated that Jewish psychologists of color already have representation in existing Ethnic Psychological Associations (EPAs). They emphasized that the purpose of EPAs is to address underrepresentation, which they argue does not apply to Jewish psychologists.

Context of Antisemitism Concerns

This opposition comes amid rising concerns about antisemitism within the APA. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has previously criticized psychologists who support the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel, labeling it a form of antisemitism. The ADL has also reported incidents of harassment faced by Jewish psychologists due to their identity. In response to the coalition's statement, ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt condemned the assertion that Jewish psychologists do not face discrimination, calling it "indefensible."

Official Responses and Calls for Action

The ADL has urged the APA to reject the coalition's position and to formally recognize the Association of Jewish Psychologists, advocating for Jewish mental health professionals to have a voice within their professional community. The ADL's statement highlights a perceived inadequacy in the APA's response to antisemitism, despite the organization's initiatives such as listening sessions and the establishment of a Collaborative of Jewish Psychologists.

Criticism of the Coalition's Position

Critics of the coalition's stance argue that it dismisses the unique challenges faced by Jewish psychologists and overlooks the broader context of rising antisemitism. The coalition's statement has been interpreted as an attempt to marginalize Jewish voices within the psychological community, raising questions about inclusivity and representation in professional organizations.

Conflicting Reports and Gaps

There is a notable discrepancy between the coalition's assertion that Jewish psychologists are adequately represented and the experiences reported by Jewish psychologists regarding discrimination and harassment. The ongoing investigation by the House Committee on Education and the Workforce into claims of antisemitism at the APA further complicates the narrative, indicating a need for deeper examination of the issues at hand.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “To suggest that Jewish psychologists do not face discrimination or deserve representation within this group is both factually wrong and harmful,” — Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the Anti-Defamation League
  • “Issues related to antisemitism and other forms of religious discrimination should be represented on APA Council,” the coalition leader said.” — Coalition of National Racial and Ethnic Psychological Associations

This situation reflects a complex intersection of race, identity, and professional representation within the field of psychology, highlighting the ongoing challenges related to discrimination and inclusivity.