ICC's Naming of Duterte Allies Intensifies Political Tensions in the Philippines

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has publicly named two sitting Philippine senators, Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa and Christopher “Bong” Go, as alleged “co-perpetrators” in the ongoing case against former President Rodrigo Duterte for crimes against humanity. This development has heightened the scrutiny on Duterte's legal challenges and intensified the political dynamics within the Philippines. The ICC's designation of these officials is based on the prosecution's theory of liability, indicating their involvement in a purported plan to “neutralise” alleged criminals through violent means, including murder.

South China Morning Post

Rodrigo Duterte, who served as president from 2016 to 2022, is facing three counts of crimes against humanity related to 76 killings that occurred during his controversial "war on drugs." This campaign, which began shortly after he took office, has been widely criticized for its brutality and alleged extrajudicial killings. The ICC's involvement stems from accusations that Duterte's administration systematically targeted individuals under the guise of law enforcement. Following his arrest in March 2025 in Manila, Duterte was transferred to The Hague, where he remains in custody as the case progresses.

South China Morning Post

The ICC's naming of Dela Rosa and Go complicates the political landscape in the Philippines, particularly as the country approaches the 2028 presidential elections. The inclusion of these senators, who are closely aligned with Duterte, signals potential shifts in Senate dynamics as various factions prepare for the upcoming electoral contest. The political ramifications of this case could influence alliances and rivalries within the legislature, as lawmakers navigate their positions in light of the ICC's findings.

South China Morning Post

The ICC's announcement has prompted varied reactions within the Philippines. While some lawmakers have expressed support for the ICC's actions, others have criticized the court's involvement in domestic affairs. The political discourse surrounding the case reflects deep divisions within the country regarding Duterte's legacy and the ongoing implications of his administration's policies.

South China Morning Post

Critics of Duterte's administration have welcomed the ICC's actions as a necessary step toward accountability for the alleged human rights violations committed during his presidency. Advocacy groups argue that the naming of Dela Rosa and Go underscores the need for justice for victims of the drug war. Conversely, supporters of Duterte view the ICC's involvement as an infringement on Philippine sovereignty and an attempt to undermine the former president's legacy.

South China Morning Post

While the ICC's filings have identified specific individuals, there remains a lack of consensus on the broader implications of these charges. Some sources highlight the potential for increased political instability, while others suggest that the situation may galvanize support for Duterte and his allies. As the February 23 hearing approaches, the legal and political ramifications of this case will continue to unfold, revealing the complexities of accountability and governance in the Philippines.

South China Morning Post

• “The designation reflects the prosecution’s theory of liability rather than a judicial finding, but the inclusion of two elected lawmakers deepens the stakes ahead of Duterte’s confirmation of charges hearing and complicates calculations within the Senate as rival factions manoeuvre before the 2028 presidential race.” — Source

South China Morning Post