Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

LIRR Executive's Ethics Violation: Job for Son Raises Concerns

2/20/2026, 4:39:22 AM

Overview of the Ethics Violation

A recent investigation by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) inspector general has revealed that Andrew Arenth, a former Assistant Chief Program Officer at the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR), improperly leveraged his position to secure employment for his son. The probe indicated that Arenth contacted employees at six different companies with active contracts with the MTA in 2023, ultimately leading to his son being hired by one of these vendors, referred to as “Vendor 1.”

Details of the Investigation

The inspector general's report, led by Daniel Cort, highlighted that Arenth utilized his MTA email account to distribute his son's resume to the contractors while overseeing significant infrastructure projects. This action was deemed a violation of the MTA's ethical standards, as it constituted soliciting a prohibited "gift"—in this case, employment for his son—from companies engaged in business with the agency. Notably, none of the six firms reported Arenth's outreach to the MTA’s Chief Compliance Officer, which is a requirement under the agency's Vendor Code of Ethics.

Consequences and Responses

Although the report did not name the company that hired Arenth's son, it noted that the son was assigned to a non-MTA project. Following the investigation, both Arenth's son and an employee from the vendor who facilitated the hire were terminated. Despite the severity of the findings, the inspector general did not recommend disciplinary action against Arenth, as he had already left his position at LIRR. The case has been forwarded to the state ethics commission for potential further action.

Official Statements

Inspector General Daniel Cort emphasized the breach of trust involved in Arenth's actions, stating, “MTA officials are entrusted to act in the public interest, not to use their positions for personal gain, such as finding jobs for their children.” He also underscored the responsibility of vendors to report unethical requests, which did not occur in this instance.

Criticism and Opposition

Critics of the situation have raised concerns about the lack of accountability for Arenth and the vendors involved. The absence of disciplinary measures has led to questions regarding the effectiveness of the MTA's oversight mechanisms and the integrity of its ethical standards.

What's Next

The investigation's findings have prompted scrutiny of the MTA's ethical practices and may lead to further actions by the state ethics commission. Stakeholders are awaiting the commission's response and any potential reforms to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “MTA officials are entrusted to act in the public interest, not to use their positions for personal gain, such as finding jobs for their children,” — Daniel Cort, Inspector General