Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

UCLA Coach Mick Cronin Apologizes for Ejection of Steven Jamerson II

2/21/2026, 12:18:12 AM

Incident Overview: Ejection During Game Against Michigan State

UCLA basketball coach Mick Cronin publicly apologized to backup center Steven Jamerson II following an incident during a game against Michigan State on February 17, 2026. The ejection occurred after Jamerson committed a hard foul on Michigan State's Carson Cooper, which led to a tumultuous moment in the game. Initially, Cronin believed Jamerson's actions warranted ejection, but after reviewing game footage, he recognized that the foul was not as severe as he had thought.

Context of the Ejection

The incident unfolded with approximately 4½ minutes remaining in the game, which UCLA lost 82-59. Jamerson attempted to block Cooper's shot from behind, resulting in a hard foul that sent Cooper tumbling to the court. The crowd reacted negatively, and as tensions rose, Jamerson walked to the bench. Cronin then directed him to the locker room, an action that drew significant criticism from media commentators who labeled Cronin's behavior as bullying and inconsistent with the values associated with UCLA basketball, particularly those established by legendary coach John Wooden.

Coach's Reflections and Apology

In his statement, Cronin described Jamerson as a "good kid" who made a poor decision during the game. He expressed disappointment in Jamerson's choice to commit a hard foul, especially given the game's score. “If you want to be a tough guy, you need to do it during the game – for block-out, for a rebound,” Cronin stated. He emphasized that Jamerson's actions were inappropriate, particularly as Cooper was defenseless in the air.

Jamerson's Background and Response

Jamerson's ejection was particularly poignant given his history with Michigan State, where he had previously attempted to walk on to the team and later served as a student manager, both of which were unsuccessful. After transferring from the University of San Diego to UCLA, Jamerson was eager to prove himself. Following the incident, he accepted Cronin's apology, humorously suggesting he wanted an additional $10,000 in name, image, and likeness funds.

Criticism and Public Reaction

The ejection and subsequent handling of the situation sparked national outrage, with various media figures criticizing Cronin's decision-making. Many commentators argued that his actions did not align with the character and integrity expected from UCLA's basketball program. This incident has raised questions about coaching authority and player treatment in high-stakes college sports.

Conclusion: Implications for UCLA Basketball

Cronin's apology and the surrounding controversy highlight the complexities of coaching decisions in college athletics, particularly regarding player conduct and disciplinary measures. As UCLA navigates the aftermath of this incident, the focus remains on maintaining the program's reputation while supporting players like Jamerson in their development on and off the court.