Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

MAHA Movement Reacts to Trump's Glyphosate Executive Order

2/21/2026, 5:58:04 AM

Executive Order Sparks Controversy

On February 18, 2026, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at boosting domestic production of glyphosate, a widely used herbicide linked to numerous health concerns, including cancer. The order invokes the Defense Production Act, emphasizing glyphosate's importance for national security and agricultural productivity. Trump stated that ensuring an adequate supply of glyphosate and elemental phosphorus is crucial for food security and military readiness. This move has drawn significant backlash from the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement, which had previously supported Trump and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

MAHA's Discontent

MAHA activists, who played a pivotal role in Trump's 2024 election victory, view the executive order as a betrayal of their principles. Kelly Ryerson, co-executive director of American Regeneration and a prominent MAHA figure, expressed disillusionment, stating, "The President is making a mockery of the very voters who put his administration into office." Many MAHA supporters, including those from the Moms Across America group, have circulated petitions urging Trump to rescind the order, arguing that it undermines their commitment to public health.

Kennedy's Support and Its Implications

Despite the backlash, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. defended the executive order, framing it as essential for national security. He stated, "When hostile actors control critical inputs, they weaken our security. By expanding domestic production, we close that gap and protect American families." This stance has left many MAHA supporters feeling betrayed, as Kennedy had previously criticized glyphosate and its manufacturer, Bayer, for its alleged health risks. Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group, remarked, "I can’t envision a bigger middle finger to every MAHA mom than this," highlighting the discontent within the movement.

Industry Context and Legal Challenges

The executive order comes at a time when Bayer is facing significant legal challenges, having proposed a $7.25 billion settlement to resolve thousands of lawsuits claiming that glyphosate causes cancer. Critics argue that Trump's order may provide Bayer and other manufacturers with immunity from future lawsuits, further complicating the legal landscape surrounding glyphosate. The order has been described by some as a "sickening love letter" to pesticide companies, reflecting the deep-seated tensions between public health advocates and agricultural interests.

Political Ramifications Ahead of Midterms

As the 2026 midterm elections approach, the fallout from Trump's executive order could have significant implications for the Republican Party. David Murphy, a former finance manager for Kennedy's campaign, warned that the GOP's embrace of glyphosate could cost them between 10 and 20 House seats. The MAHA movement's discontent may lead to decreased voter turnout among its supporters, complicating the party's efforts to maintain control in Congress.

Conclusion

Trump's executive order on glyphosate has ignited a fierce debate within the MAHA movement and raised questions about the future of the coalition that helped propel him to victory in 2024. As activists express their outrage and call for action, the political landscape leading into the midterms remains uncertain, with potential ramifications for both Trump and the Republican Party.