Story perspectives

Federal vs. State: Battle for Prediction Market Control

2/22/2026

Summary

Story summary

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) asserts exclusive federal authority over Kalshi and Polymarket.
States push for local gambling-law oversight despite federal claims of exclusivity.
Kalshi trades in all 50 states and faces 19 lawsuits.
The dispute highlights tension between federal and state regulation in prediction markets.
Advocates say these markets democratize trading while critics call them illegal gambling.

History

Historical Context

The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) of 2006 aimed to restrict online gambling by prohibiting financial transactions with illegal gambling sites, impacting companies like PokerStars. This legislation reflects ongoing federal-state tensions over regulatory authority, echoing historical conflicts such as the 1934 Securities Exchange Act, which established federal oversight of securities markets. The outcome may reshape the future of prediction markets and online gambling regulation.

1 of 2

Story summary

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) asserts exclusive federal authority over Kalshi and Polymarket.
States push for local gambling-law oversight despite federal claims of exclusivity.
Kalshi trades in all 50 states and faces 19 lawsuits.
The dispute highlights tension between federal and state regulation in prediction markets.
Advocates say these markets democratize trading while critics call them illegal gambling.

1 / 2