Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Allegations and Controversies Surrounding Former Deputy Commissioner Jevon McSkimming

2/22/2026, 10:32:08 PM

Overview of the Allegations

Former New Zealand Deputy Commissioner Jevon McSkimming is embroiled in a controversy involving allegations of sexual misconduct and subsequent demands for payment from a woman identified only as Ms Z. The situation escalated following anonymous emails sent to McSkimming, which began on February 9, 2024, demanding $600 for each sexual act allegedly obtained through deception during their relationship.

Background of the Relationship

McSkimming and Ms Z reportedly had a sexual relationship from 2016 to 2017, when she was a 21-year-old student and he was a 42-year-old police superintendent. The affair was disclosed by McSkimming to his wife and employer in May 2018, after which Ms Z began to threaten him, according to a colleague's testimony in an Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) report.

Details of the Email Correspondence

The emails sent to McSkimming included explicit demands for payment, with one email stating, “$600 for every time [I was] deceived into performing any sexual act.” Subsequent emails reiterated these demands and suggested a total of around 300 acts requiring payment. The correspondence continued until February 18, 2024, with messages expressing disappointment that the affair had not led to a marriage breakdown.

Police Investigation and Findings

The IPCA's report, released in November 2023, criticized the police's handling of Ms Z's allegations, noting significant failings and a lack of action from senior officers. Newly appointed Police Commissioner Richard Chambers acknowledged that Ms Z had been “ignored” and accused high-ranking officers of participating in a “cover-up.” Despite a criminal investigation initiated in October 2024, McSkimming was not charged due to insufficient evidence.

Criticism of Police Response

Critics have pointed out that the police's approach to Ms Z's allegations was flawed, with an unquestioning acceptance of McSkimming's narrative contributing to the failures in the investigation. A source with extensive experience in police investigations noted that the perception of the complainant's behavior could influence the decision-making process regarding prosecution.

Official Statements and Responses

Ms Z, through her lawyer, expressed regret over some of her actions in raising concerns about McSkimming, stating, “I accept that not every step I took in raising my concerns was the right one.” She emphasized her motivation to hold McSkimming accountable despite the police's decision not to charge him for sexual offenses.

Ongoing Investigations

The IPCA is expected to release a second report examining the robustness of the police investigation into Ms Z's claims and the adequacy of inquiries into McSkimming's possession of objectionable material, which led to his conviction and nine months of home detention. Additionally, a separate complaint against Ms Z for online harassment remains pending in court.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “If you were lied to then does that mean you consent?” — Anonymous Email
  • “I regret some aspects of how I sought to have those concerns addressed.” — Ms Z
  • “The standard of proof for any prosecution is proving the case beyond reasonable doubt,” — Source, former police detective

This situation highlights significant issues within the New Zealand Police regarding the handling of sexual misconduct allegations and the complexities involved in such investigations.