Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Utah Grapples with Consensual Relationships Between Unlicensed Care Staff and Elderly Residents

2/25/2026, 3:54:36 AM

Increasing Concerns Over Power Dynamics in Long-Term Care Facilities

Utah officials are facing growing challenges regarding consensual sexual relationships between elderly residents in long-term care facilities and unlicensed caregivers. Reports have surfaced of various incidents, including an 18-year-old high school student engaging in sexual relations with multiple residents and encouraging peers to apply for jobs at these facilities. In another case, a nursing assistant initiated a relationship with a resident over 50 years her senior, allegedly to exploit him financially. Additionally, a physical therapy aide was found attempting to have sex with an 80-year-old woman who had been reported missing. Kaye Lynn Wootton, director of the Medicaid Fraud and Patient Abuse Division within the Utah Attorney General’s Office, highlighted these incidents to state lawmakers, emphasizing the inherent power imbalances that can leave vulnerable adults susceptible to exploitation.

Legal Framework and Legislative Efforts

Current Utah law prohibits non-consensual sexual contact between staff and patients in long-term care settings. Licensed professionals, such as doctors and nurses, are also barred from engaging in consensual relationships with their patients. However, these restrictions do not extend to unlicensed staff, including Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), housekeepers, and food service employees. This gap in regulation has prompted state Senator Jennifer Plumb to sponsor legislation aimed at criminalizing such relationships. Plumb, who is also an emergency room doctor, expressed concern about the frequency of these incidents and the lack of accountability for unlicensed staff who may move between facilities without consequence.

Divergent Perspectives on Regulation

While some advocate for stricter regulations, others argue against criminalizing consensual relationships. Nate Crippes, an attorney with the Disability Law Center, contended that such laws would unfairly penalize one party in consensual relationships, potentially leading to discrimination. He suggested that the focus should instead be on improving accountability within the healthcare system rather than imposing criminal penalties. Crippes pointed out that if unlicensed staff are regularly dismissed for inappropriate conduct, it indicates that existing accountability measures are functioning.

Calls for Systemic Change

Lori Smetanka, executive director of the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care, emphasized the need for policies that prohibit staff from entering into relationships with patients due to the inherent power dynamics and potential for coercion. Wootton echoed this sentiment, stating that clearer regulations would help ensure that care providers understand the inappropriateness of such relationships. Despite the complexities surrounding the issue, Plumb noted that raising awareness may be a crucial step toward advocating for better protections for residents.

Future Considerations

While Plumb does not plan to reintroduce the legislation in the current session, she remains open to revisiting the issue in the future. The ongoing discussions highlight the need for a comprehensive approach to address the challenges posed by consensual relationships in long-term care facilities, balancing the rights of residents with the necessity of safeguarding their well-being.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Imagine when that relationship, if there was a real relationship, goes south,” — Kaye Lynn Wootton, Director, Medicaid Fraud and Patient Abuse Division
  • “There really isn't a lever to have the ability one to potentially pursue any sort of consequences or justice from it or to have any traceability from it,” — Senator Jennifer Plumb, D-Salt Lake City
  • “If there’s a subset of the health care industry – you know, the CNAs or the techs or whatever they are – that are unregulated such that they can go around and engage in activity they shouldn’t, get fired and then just go get another job, I don’t think the answer is to criminalize that,” he argued in an interview.” — Nate Crippes, Attorney, Disability Law Center
  • “In order to protect the facility, frankly, from liability, you know, and to protect the residents, it should just not be allowed, and there should be policies addressing that,” — Lori Smetanka, Executive Director, National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care