Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Controversial Red Card and Disallowed Goal in Liverpool vs. Manchester City Match

2/25/2026, 1:58:59 PM

Incident Overview: Szoboszlai's Red Card and Goal Disallowance

During a recent Premier League match on February 8, 2025, between Liverpool and Manchester City, a controversial incident unfolded involving Liverpool midfielder Dominik Szoboszlai and Manchester City striker Erling Haaland. Referee Craig Pawson initially awarded a late goal to Manchester City, scored by Rayan Cherki, but it was disallowed after a Video Assistant Referee (VAR) review. Szoboszlai was subsequently sent off for denying a clear goalscoring opportunity.

Sequence of Events

The incident began when Szoboszlai fouled Haaland, which Pawson did not initially see, allowing play to continue. Cherki's goal appeared to secure a 3-1 victory for Manchester City, but VAR intervened, citing Haaland's foul on Szoboszlai as the reason for disallowing the goal. The VAR team, led by John Brooks, determined that Haaland's foul prevented Szoboszlai from clearing the ball, thus justifying the red card for Szoboszlai under the "Denial of an Obvious Goalscoring Opportunity" (DOGSO) rule.

Howard Webb's Explanation

Howard Webb, the chief operating officer of the Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMO), provided insights into the decision-making process during the "Match Officials Mic'd Up" segment. He emphasized that the goal could not stand because Haaland's foul on Szoboszlai was pivotal in the sequence leading to the goal. Webb stated, “The ball only goes in the goal because Erling Haaland pulls Szoboszlai, preventing him from being able to clear the ball.” He noted that while the referee attempted to play an advantage, the initial foul by Szoboszlai had to be penalized.

Criticism and Opposition

The decision has drawn criticism from various commentators and fans. Former player Gary Neville expressed his discontent, stating, “That feels so unjust... There is no person who would disallow that goal. But it's going to be disallowed. Talk about killjoy.” This sentiment reflects a broader frustration regarding the impact of VAR on the flow and spirit of the game.

Official Statements & Responses

Webb reiterated that the application of VAR is intended to ensure fairness in officiating. He acknowledged the challenges referees face in real-time decision-making but maintained that the final ruling was correct based on the rules. He remarked, “We can’t ignore that; we can’t therefore just allow the advantage because it's only accrued because of that action by Haaland.”

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

While Webb and the officiating team supported the decision, some observers argue that the incident reflects a growing disconnect between the rules and the game's natural flow. The debate continues regarding the balance between strict adherence to rules and maintaining the essence of football.

What's Next

The incident has sparked discussions about the future use of VAR in the Premier League, with calls for clearer guidelines and better communication between match officials and fans. As the league progresses, the implications of this decision may influence how similar situations are handled in upcoming matches.