Full Breakdown
South Dakota Senate's Chaotic Day: Data Center Bills Fail Amidst Absences
2/25/2026, 10:16:23 PM
Core Event: Absence of Key Senator Leads to Legislative Defeat
On February 24, 2026, the South Dakota Senate faced significant turmoil as two bills aimed at incentivizing data centers were defeated, largely due to the unexplained absence of Senator John Carley, a Republican from Piedmont. Carley, who opposed both bills, was not present during critical votes, prompting accusations of a deliberate maneuver to obstruct the legislation. The situation escalated as senators attempted to locate Carley, including enlisting the governor's help to reach him, but he remained unaccounted for, leading to a chaotic atmosphere in the Senate chamber.
Legislative Background: The Data Center Debate
The two bills in question were introduced by Senator Casey Crabtree, a Republican from Madison. One bill proposed altering a sales tax rebate program to benefit data centers, while the other sought to exempt backup generators from state permitting requirements, provided they were not connected to the electrical grid. The debate surrounding data centers has been contentious, with proponents highlighting potential economic benefits and opponents raising concerns about their substantial energy demands and environmental impacts.
Timeline of Events
- February 23, 2026: Crabtree's sales tax rebate bill fails 17-16, with Senator Arch Beal excused and Senator Tom Pischke absent.
- February 23, 2026: The backup generator bill fails in a 17-17 tie, with Governor Tony Venhuizen opting not to cast a tie-breaking vote.
- February 24, 2026: Senators attempt to locate Carley, leading to a 40-minute search that yields no results.
- February 24, 2026: The Senate votes 19-14 to proceed without Carley, ultimately defeating both data center bills.
Criticism & Opposition: Accusations of Political Maneuvering
The absence of Carley drew sharp criticism, including from former Governor Dennis Daugaard, who characterized it as a "parliamentary maneuver" designed to avoid voting. Daugaard expressed concern that such actions discredit the representatives' responsibilities to their constituents. Senator Pischke, who had briefly been absent the previous day, distanced himself from Carley's absence, emphasizing that he did not condone missing an entire day of voting.
Official Statements & Responses
Senator Tim Reed remarked on the situation, stating, “It’s not a good look for the Senate,” highlighting the negative perception of the Senate's handling of the legislative process. Meanwhile, Crabtree expressed his intention to seek reconsideration of the bills, although the procedural challenges ultimately led to their defeat.
What's Next: Potential for Future Amendments
While both data center bills are currently dead, there remains a possibility for their revival as amendments to other legislation before the end of the legislative session next month. The ongoing debate over data centers in South Dakota is likely to continue, reflecting broader tensions regarding economic development and environmental sustainability.
