Full Breakdown
LA County CEO Fesia Davenport Faces Lawsuit Over $2 Million Settlement
2/27/2026, 9:14:12 AM
Allegations of Illegal Gift of Public Funds
A lawsuit has been filed against Los Angeles County CEO Fesia Davenport, alleging that a $2 million settlement approved by the LA County Board of Supervisors constitutes an illegal "gift of public funds." The lawsuit, initiated by county resident Ana Cristina Lee Escudero, claims that the payout was made without a legitimate legal dispute and was instead a backroom deal intended to compensate Davenport for alleged reputational harm and emotional distress following the passage of a ballot measure that will transition her position from appointed to elected in 2028.
The settlement was approved in August 2025 but remained undisclosed until uncovered by LAist. Critics argue that the payout violates the California Constitution, which prohibits local governments from making payments that lack legal merit. The lawsuit contends that Davenport had previously informed the Board of Supervisors that she had "no intentions of litigating this matter," further questioning the legitimacy of the settlement.
Responses from Officials
Mira Hashmall, an attorney representing the county, has dismissed the lawsuit as "baseless," asserting that the payout served a "legitimate public purpose" by averting potential litigation. However, the timing of the settlement has raised eyebrows, particularly as Davenport was reportedly on medical leave and had communicated to county employees that there were no funds available for raises amid claims of financial distress within the county.
Union representatives have expressed outrage over the settlement. Anthony Meraz, vice president of the sheriff’s deputies’ union, criticized the decision, stating, "Leaders eat last," and emphasized the expectation that those in leadership should prioritize the welfare of their employees.
Legal Framework and Implications
The lawsuit seeks to compel Davenport to return the $2 million to taxpayers. Under California law, local government settlements are deemed illegal if they arise from claims that lack legal merit, and any payout must not exceed the agency's maximum exposure from a claim. This legal framework will play a crucial role in determining the outcome of the lawsuit.
Criticism and Public Sentiment
The public reaction to the settlement has been largely negative, with many viewing it as a misuse of taxpayer funds. David Green, president of SEIU 721, which represents thousands of county employees, echoed the sentiment of frustration among union members regarding the perceived prioritization of Davenport's financial compensation over employee welfare.
What's Next
As the lawsuit progresses, it will likely draw further scrutiny on the practices of the LA County Board of Supervisors and the handling of public funds. The outcome may set a precedent regarding the legality of similar settlements in the future, particularly in cases involving public officials and their compensation.
Verbatim Quotes
- “That’s substantial money at a time where the county is claiming economic and financial distress,” — Anthony Meraz, Deputy Sheriff
- “Leaders eat last,” — Anthony Meraz, Deputy Sheriff
- “This is as bad as it gets.” — Brian Claypool, Attorney for Escudero
The unfolding legal battle over the settlement is poised to highlight broader issues of governance and accountability within Los Angeles County.
