The Evolving Landscape of Oscar-Worthy Characters

The 2026 Academy Awards nominations reveal a notable shift in the types of characters that resonate with voters, moving away from the traditional archetypes of likable heroes and charming villains. Historically, winning an acting Oscar often required portraying characters that audiences could root for, such as Tom Hanks in *Forrest Gump* or Gwyneth Paltrow in *Shakespeare in Love*. However, this year’s nominees present a more complex array of characters, including those who are difficult to like or even outright unlikable.

The Guardian

Among the nominees, Emma Stone’s performance in *Bugonia* stands out as she plays a cold CEO embroiled in a kidnapping scenario. The film actively undermines any sympathy for her character, presenting a stark contrast to the typical Oscar-winning roles. Similarly, Timothée Chalamet’s character in *Marty Supreme* faces a series of self-destructive choices, prompting debate over his likability. In the supporting categories, Stellan Skarsgård portrays a selfish father in *Sentimental Value*, while Teyana Taylor’s revolutionary character in *One Battle After Another* complicates traditional notions of heroism by betraying her comrades.

The Guardian

This year’s nominations reflect a broader weariness with simplistic portrayals of heroism and villainy. The presence of characters like Sean Penn’s cartoonish villain in *One Battle After Another* suggests that audiences may be seeking more nuanced representations of morality. Critics argue that this trend towards "difficult" characters may stem from a desire for realism in storytelling, as these portrayals resonate with the complexities of real life.

The Guardian

Academy voters appear to be responding to this shift, as evidenced by the nominations of characters who defy traditional likability. The trend is seen as a potential unbundling of the connection between star power and audience appeal, allowing for performances that challenge conventional expectations. This year’s nominees are characterized by strong performances that prioritize depth over charm, suggesting a significant evolution in the criteria for Oscar-worthy roles.

The Guardian

While the trend towards unlikable characters has its supporters, some critics argue that it risks alienating audiences who prefer more relatable figures. The complexity of characters like those portrayed by Stone and Chalamet may not resonate with all viewers, leading to discussions about the balance between artistic expression and audience engagement.

The Guardian

• “Still, it’s hard not to look at this trend as freeing on some level, if for no other reason than this year’s group of nominees is especially strong: no hammy impressions, no de facto lifetime achievement awards, virtually embarrassment-free.” — The Guardian Film Critic

The Guardian

• “Still, the shadow of likability (and the love-to-hate villainy, which is really just a different form of likability) doesn’t loom as large over this year’s crop of nominated actors.” — The Guardian Film Critic

The Guardian

As the Academy Awards approach, the evolving landscape of character portrayals raises questions about the future of storytelling in film and the criteria that define excellence in acting. The 2026 nominations may signal a new era where complexity and realism take precedence over traditional notions of likability.

The Guardian