Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Legal Action Against California Parole Division Following Fatal Incident

3/5/2026, 4:23:59 AM

Overview of the Incident

On New Year's Eve 2020, Hanako Abe, a 27-year-old woman from San Francisco, was killed by Troy McAlister, a parolee with a history of violent offenses. Following this tragedy, attorney Anh Phoong has filed a wrongful death claim against California's Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), alleging negligence on the part of the parole division. The claim cites a whistleblower email indicating that parole agents were instructed to ignore requests for assistance in locating McAlister, despite his criminal activities.

Background & Context

Troy McAlister had been arrested multiple times in 2020 while on parole, including for a violent carjacking on December 29. The Daly City Police Department requested help from parole agent Roberto Vasquez to locate McAlister, who was suspected of committing further crimes. However, Vasquez reportedly did not act on this request, which was compounded by directives from his supervisors to limit enforcement actions due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Key Figures Involved

  • Troy McAlister: The parolee responsible for the deaths of Hanako Abe and another woman, Elizabeth Pratt. He had a lengthy criminal history and was on his third stint of parole at the time of the incident.
  • Anh Phoong: The personal injury attorney representing the families of the victims, advocating for accountability from the parole division.
  • Roberto Vasquez: The parole agent who allegedly ignored the police request to locate McAlister.
  • Rhoderick Reyes and Tom Porter: Other parole agents implicated in the claim for failing to supervise McAlister adequately.

Official Statements & Responses

Phoong stated, “This tragedy was not random,” emphasizing that the parole division had received multiple warnings about McAlister's criminal behavior. She criticized the lack of action from parole agents, asserting that their negligence directly contributed to the deaths of Abe and Pratt. The claim also highlights an internal email from Porter, which instructed agents not to pursue parole violations, citing the pandemic as a reason for limited enforcement.

Criticism & Opposition

Critics of the parole division argue that the failure to act on police requests and the internal directives to limit supervision reflect systemic issues within California's parole system. The claim raises questions about public safety and accountability, with Phoong noting that the families of the victims are seeking answers regarding the circumstances that allowed McAlister to remain free despite his criminal history.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

While the claim outlines a clear narrative of negligence, it does not provide detailed information on the specific internal policies that led to the decision-making process within the parole division. Additionally, there is no mention of any disciplinary actions taken against the involved parole agents following the incident.

What's Next

The wrongful death claim filed by Anh Phoong serves as a precursor to a potential lawsuit against the CDCR. The outcome of this legal action may prompt further scrutiny of California's parole policies and their implications for public safety.