Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Demands for the Return of a Deaf Child Deported to Colombia

3/7/2026, 9:26:53 PM

Incident Overview: Family Detained During Immigration Check-In

Lesly Rodriguez Gutierrez, a 28-year-old mother, and her two sons, aged 6 and 5, were deported to Colombia after being detained during a routine immigration check-in at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office in San Francisco on March 3, 2026. The family had been living in the Bay Area for four years, having fled Colombia to escape an abusive relationship involving gang violence. The 6-year-old boy, Joseph Rodriguez, is deaf and relies on assistive hearing devices, which he was unable to take with him during the deportation.

Official Responses and Advocacy

California State Superintendent Tony Thurmond has publicly condemned the deportation, calling for the immediate return of the family. He emphasized the need for the child to access critical medical devices and educational support, stating, “No child should be ripped from their home community and hidden in a detention center, especially not a Deaf child who is being deprived of the ability to communicate and understand what is happening to him.” Thurmond has urged newly appointed Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin to intervene and facilitate the family's return.

Nikolas De Bremaeker, the family’s attorney from Centro Legal de la Raza, expressed outrage over the handling of the case, noting that the family was misled about their whereabouts during the detention process. He stated, “We were told at every point that the family was at a different location,” which hindered efforts to file emergency petitions to contest the deportation.

Criticism of ICE and Legal Context

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) defended ICE's actions, asserting that Gutierrez had received due process and chose to be removed with her children. The DHS stated, “ICE does NOT separate families. Parents are given a choice: They can be removed with their children or place them with a safe person they designate.” However, advocates argue that the family was under a supervision order that should have provided them with protections against deportation while their asylum case was pending.

De Bremaeker highlighted that both the claims of domestic abuse and the child's disability should have been considered significant factors in their asylum case. He criticized the rapid deportation as “inhumane, illegal, and unconstitutional,” emphasizing the detrimental impact on the child's education and well-being.

Broader Implications and Community Response

The incident has sparked broader discussions about immigration enforcement practices under the Trump administration, particularly regarding the treatment of vulnerable populations, including children with disabilities. Educators from the California School for the Deaf have expressed concern that the disruption to Joseph's education could have lasting negative effects on his development, as he has been learning American Sign Language (ASL), which differs significantly from Colombian sign language.

Thurmond and De Bremaeker have vowed to pursue all available avenues to support the family, including legal and governmental channels. The case has drawn attention to the challenges faced by immigrant families navigating the U.S. immigration system, particularly those with special needs.

Conclusion: Calls for Action

As the situation unfolds, advocates continue to call for the immediate return of Joseph Rodriguez and his family to ensure they can access the necessary support and care. The case highlights ongoing concerns about the treatment of immigrants in the U.S. and the need for reforms to protect the rights and well-being of families facing deportation.