Full Breakdown
Russia Declares International Law Effectively Non-Existent Amid Global Tensions
3/8/2026, 10:08:36 PM
Kremlin's Position on International Law
On March 8, 2023, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated that international law has effectively ceased to function as a viable framework for global governance. In an interview with Russian media, Peskov emphasized that the current global legal system is in a state of crisis, where legal norms exist only on paper and have lost their practical significance. He remarked, “We have all lost what we call international law… I don't even understand how anyone can be called upon to follow the norms and principles of international law. It effectively no longer exists.” Peskov's comments reflect a broader sentiment that the international legal order is in disarray, particularly in light of recent geopolitical events.
Context of the Statement
Peskov's remarks come amid escalating tensions in West Asia, particularly following the U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran. He noted that the situation in the region has become significantly destabilized, leading to both economic and political repercussions. The Kremlin's assertion that international law is "de jure" present but "de facto" non-existent highlights a growing frustration with the inability of global legal norms to address contemporary conflicts. Peskov also pointed to the U.S. operation in Caracas, which was criticized as illegal, as a catalyst for this discussion, underscoring a perceived shift in global governance towards power dynamics rather than legal frameworks.
Call for a Summit of P-5 Nations
In light of these developments, Peskov reiterated President Vladimir Putin's earlier proposal for a summit of the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) — Russia, the United States, China, France, and the United Kingdom. This proposal, initially made before the COVID-19 pandemic, aims to address global security and stability concerns. Peskov argued that the deteriorating international environment necessitates a revisitation of this initiative to foster dialogue among the world's major powers.
Criticism & Opposition
Critics of the Kremlin's stance argue that declaring international law dead undermines efforts to resolve conflicts through diplomatic means. Some experts contend that while the enforcement of international law may be challenged, the principles themselves remain vital for maintaining order in international relations. The U.S. response to accusations of illegality in its actions, particularly regarding the strikes in Iran, further complicates the discourse on the relevance of international law.
Official Statements & Responses
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has also weighed in, calling on the U.S. to clarify its broader strategic intentions and how they align with existing international norms. This statement reflects a desire for transparency and accountability in international relations, particularly from nations wielding significant military power.
Verbatim Quotes
- “We cannot tell anyone to follow international law. Follow which law? Nobody can formulate today what it is,” — Dmitry Peskov, Kremlin Spokesman
- “The region has become significantly destabilised, and the cumulative effect of the vast number of regional conflicts and unresolved issues is resulting in both economic and political consequences,” — Dmitry Peskov, Kremlin Spokesman
As global tensions continue to rise, the Kremlin's declaration raises critical questions about the future of international law and the mechanisms available for conflict resolution in an increasingly polarized world.
