Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Tattoo Business Sues Former Employees Over Allegations of Unsanitary Conditions

3/9/2026, 12:25:29 AM

Overview of the Lawsuit

Live by the Sword (LBTS), a prominent tattoo business with locations in SoHo and Williamsburg, New York, has initiated a $3 million defamation lawsuit against three former employees. The lawsuit stems from allegations made by these ex-workers regarding unsanitary conditions at the tattoo parlors, including the use of contaminated tools and the presence of pests such as rats, roaches, and bedbugs. The business claims that these allegations have caused significant harm to its reputation and client base.

Allegations of Unsanitary Conditions

The controversy began in December when former piercer Wiki Karwacki posted images on Instagram depicting alleged unsanitary conditions within LBTS, including a dead rat and pools of blood. Karwacki expressed concern for public health, stating, “Who knows how many individuals exposed themselves to avoidable infections and/or other complications.” Following her post, other former employees, including Marcy Mattes, echoed similar claims, alleging that the shop had a history of poor sanitation practices.

Business Response and Claims

LBTS co-owner Greg Ferreira defended the business, asserting that no health code violations have been identified in multiple inspections conducted by the New York City Health Department. Ferreira attributed the presence of a dead rat to a one-time incident involving food left out by a worker and emphasized the company's commitment to sanitation, citing substantial investments in sterilization and pest control.

In the lawsuit, LBTS contends that the former employees colluded to harm the business and that their actions have resulted in a loss of over $1 million in potential revenue. The business claims that the ex-workers are attempting to enrich themselves by directing clients to alternative piercing services.

Perspectives from Former Employees

The defendants have characterized the lawsuit as an attempt to silence whistleblowers. Samantha Vargas, another former employee, stated, “It’s a ridiculous lawsuit,” and expressed frustration over the financial burden of legal fees. She noted that the social media posts did not lead to increased business for her or her associates.

Mattes, who worked at LBTS for three years, described the conditions as “disgusting” and claimed that employees often took shortcuts in cleaning instruments. She recounted instances where used needles were improperly disposed of, raising serious safety concerns.

Official Statements

LBTS has maintained that its operations comply with health standards set by the New York City Department of Health. The business issued a statement through its legal representation, asserting its commitment to providing safe and professional services to clients.

Conflicting Reports

While LBTS claims that no health violations have been found, the former employees argue that the conditions they witnessed were hazardous and unacceptable. This discrepancy highlights the ongoing debate over workplace safety and sanitation in the tattoo industry.

Conclusion

The lawsuit filed by Live by the Sword against its former employees underscores the tension between business interests and employee rights to report unsafe conditions. As the case unfolds, it raises critical questions about accountability and transparency within the tattoo industry.