Trump’s Executive Order on Glyphosate and National Security

In February 2026, President Donald Trump issued an executive order mandating the production of glyphosate, a widely debated herbicide known as Roundup. This decision has sparked significant backlash from health activists who argue that glyphosate is linked to cancer. However, the order also highlighted another contentious issue: the production of white phosphorus, a substance used in both agricultural applications and military munitions.

New York Times

Bayer AG, the sole manufacturer of glyphosate in the United States, also produces white phosphorus, which is utilized in the creation of munitions for the U.S. military. This dual-use nature of the chemical has raised concerns regarding its implications for both public health and national security. According to sources familiar with the administration's discussions, the availability of phosphorus for defense purposes was a significant factor influencing Trump’s decision to classify Bayer’s operations as a national security priority.

New York Times

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt emphasized that the executive order was driven by national security considerations. She stated, “The president made this decision based on national security priorities,” indicating that the administration views the production of munitions as critical in light of recent military actions by the United States. Additionally, the administration is reportedly investing in research to find alternatives to glyphosate, reflecting an awareness of the health concerns surrounding its use.

New York Times

Health activists and environmental groups have expressed strong opposition to the executive order, arguing that it prioritizes military needs over public health. Critics contend that the links between glyphosate and cancer warrant a reevaluation of its production and use, regardless of its military applications. The decision has been characterized as a troubling example of how national security considerations can overshadow health and environmental concerns.

New York Times

While the executive order has been framed as a response to national security needs, there is a lack of clarity regarding the specific military actions that prompted this urgency. Furthermore, the extent to which Bayer’s operations will be affected by this order remains uncertain, as does the timeline for any potential alternatives to glyphosate.

New York Times

• “The president made this decision based on national security priorities.” — Karoline Leavitt, White House Press Secretary

New York Times

This executive order illustrates the complex interplay between agricultural practices, public health, and national security, raising questions about the future of glyphosate and its implications for both the environment and military readiness.

New York Times