Story perspectives

Travis Scott Leads Artists Urging Supreme Court on Death Row Case

3/11/2026

Summary

Story summary

Travis Scott and more than 30 artists filed amicus briefs urging the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene in James Garfield Broadnax's Texas death-row case.
Broadnax's rap lyrics were used by prosecutors to argue for his future dangerousness.
His execution is scheduled for April 30, 2026.
The briefs contend that using rap lyrics as evidence violates First Amendment rights, perpetuates racial bias, and acknowledge that rap is often fictional.

History

Historical Context

The U.S. Supreme Court's 1971 ruling in Cohen v. California affirmed the First Amendment's protection of provocative speech, stemming from a history of evolving free speech interpretations. This decision followed earlier cases like Schenck v. United States, which limited speech during wartime. Today, artists like Travis Scott argue that using rap lyrics in legal cases similarly threatens free expression, potentially shaping future legal standards.

1 of 2

Story summary

Travis Scott and more than 30 artists filed amicus briefs urging the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene in James Garfield Broadnax's Texas death-row case.
Broadnax's rap lyrics were used by prosecutors to argue for his future dangerousness.
His execution is scheduled for April 30, 2026.
The briefs contend that using rap lyrics as evidence violates First Amendment rights, perpetuates racial bias, and acknowledge that rap is often fictional.

1 / 2