Full Breakdown
Big 12 Commissioner Advocates for SCORE Act Amid College Athletics Challenges
3/11/2026, 1:49:44 PM
Meeting Highlights and Legislative Focus
Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark recently described his meeting with President Donald Trump and other NCAA officials as “very constructive.” The discussion centered on the SCORE Act, which Yormark believes is the optimal solution for addressing the financial challenges facing college athletics, particularly those stemming from the introduction of name, image, and likeness (NIL) payments to athletes. The meeting took place at the White House prior to the men’s Big 12 Tournament, where the urgency of addressing rising costs in college sports was a primary concern.
The SCORE Act aims to provide the NCAA with a limited antitrust exemption and preempt state laws regarding NIL, although it faces opposition from many Democrats who view it as a potential giveaway to the NCAA and its most powerful member institutions. Yormark expressed optimism about the bill's momentum, stating, “I think there’s real momentum for the SCORE Act, and we need it.”
Trump’s Concerns and Legislative Challenges
During the meeting, Trump expressed his concerns about the sustainability of the educational system due to the financial pressures of NIL payments. He noted that high-revenue sports, particularly football and men’s basketball, could jeopardize smaller sports and women’s athletics. Trump stated, “The whole educational system is going to go out of business because of this,” highlighting the potential insolvency of institutions that are heavily investing in athlete compensation.
Despite the support for the SCORE Act, including backing from House Speaker Mike Johnson, its passage through Congress remains uncertain. The complexities of the legislative process and differing opinions on the role of federal intervention in college athletics contribute to the challenges facing the bill.
Yormark’s Perspective on the SCORE Act
Yormark articulated several reasons why he believes the SCORE Act is essential. He emphasized that the legislation would provide federal protections and liability safeguards, enabling schools to enforce rules more effectively. Additionally, the act includes provisions that clarify that student-athletes are not employees, a sentiment echoed by many athletes who prefer to maintain their status as students rather than employees.
While acknowledging that the SCORE Act does not prevent lawsuits, Yormark noted that it offers a level of protection for schools amid increasing legal challenges from athletes. He remains focused on the future, stating, “I never look back. I’m not that type of guy. I like to look forward.”
Conclusion and Next Steps
As discussions continue, Yormark and other stakeholders are working diligently on advancing the SCORE Act. Trump has indicated plans to draft an executive order related to college sports, which could further influence the legislative landscape. The outcome of these efforts will be crucial in shaping the future of college athletics and addressing the financial pressures that have emerged in recent years.
