Back to today’s briefing

Story perspectives

High Court Rules for Designer in Trademark Battle

3/11/2026

39 6 Full Breakdown

Summary

Story summary

The High Court of Australia ruled in favor of fashion designer Katie Taylor, allowing her to continue using the "Katie Perry" trademark for her clothing line.
The decision ends a 17-year battle with pop star Katy Perry, who argued the mark could confuse consumers.
The court found the trademark did not infringe due to registration before Perry rose to fame.
The case will return to the Full Federal Court to address additional issues.

History

Historical Context

The U.S. Supreme Court's 2006 ruling in favor of the Washington Redskins emphasized the significance of trademark registration, addressing complexities in trademark law regarding consumer confusion. Similarly, a recent Australian ruling allowed Katie Taylor to retain the "Katie Perry" trademark, despite Katy Perry's fame, highlighting ongoing legal challenges in intellectual property rights and their implications for businesses and celebrities.

1 of 2

Story summary

The High Court of Australia ruled in favor of fashion designer Katie Taylor, allowing her to continue using the "Katie Perry" trademark for her clothing line.
The decision ends a 17-year battle with pop star Katy Perry, who argued the mark could confuse consumers.
The court found the trademark did not infringe due to registration before Perry rose to fame.
The case will return to the Full Federal Court to address additional issues.

1 / 2