Story perspectives

Amazon Wins Injunction Against Perplexity's AI Access

3/12/2026

24 5

Summary

Story summary

Amazon obtained a preliminary injunction from Judge Maxine Chesney barring Perplexity's Comet AI from accessing Amazon accounts for purchases.
The court held that user consent does not constitute platform authorization for access.
Amazon argued Comet's actions posed security risks and violated Amazon's terms of service.
The case could set a precedent for how AI agents interact with major platforms.
Perplexity has until March 17 to appeal.

History

Historical Context

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), enacted in 1998, aimed to address copyright challenges in the digital realm, emphasizing user consent and platform authorization. This framework is now central to the 2023 lawsuit against Amazon, where the Federal Trade Commission alleges anti-competitive practices. The case's outcome could reshape regulations governing AI interactions and user rights, reflecting ongoing tensions in digital copyright and privacy.

1 of 2

Story summary

Amazon obtained a preliminary injunction from Judge Maxine Chesney barring Perplexity's Comet AI from accessing Amazon accounts for purchases.
The court held that user consent does not constitute platform authorization for access.
Amazon argued Comet's actions posed security risks and violated Amazon's terms of service.
The case could set a precedent for how AI agents interact with major platforms.
Perplexity has until March 17 to appeal.

1 / 2