Story perspectives

Grammarly Disables Feature Amid $5M Privacy Lawsuit

3/13/2026

Summary

Story summary

Grammarly disabled its 'Expert Review' feature amid a class-action lawsuit filed by journalist Julia Angwin.
The lawsuit alleges Grammarly misused writers' identities, including Stephen King, to generate AI-driven editing suggestions without consent.
Angwin seeks damages exceeding $5 million and argues this violates privacy rights.
Superhuman, Grammarly's parent company, acknowledged backlash and said it would reassess its approach to expert representation.

History

Historical Context

The Privacy Act of 1974 established a framework for protecting personal data held by federal agencies, responding to public concerns over government surveillance following scandals like Watergate. This law aimed to restore trust and allowed individuals to access their information. Julia Angwin's lawsuit against Grammarly highlights ongoing privacy issues, reflecting the evolving challenges of data protection in the digital age.

1 of 2

Story summary

Grammarly disabled its 'Expert Review' feature amid a class-action lawsuit filed by journalist Julia Angwin.
The lawsuit alleges Grammarly misused writers' identities, including Stephen King, to generate AI-driven editing suggestions without consent.
Angwin seeks damages exceeding $5 million and argues this violates privacy rights.
Superhuman, Grammarly's parent company, acknowledged backlash and said it would reassess its approach to expert representation.

1 / 2