Story perspectives

Class-Action Lawsuit Claims David Protein Misled on Nutrition

3/15/2026

Summary

Story summary

A class-action lawsuit accuses Linus Technology, parent of David Protein, of misrepresenting nutritional information on its high-protein bars.
Plaintiffs allege that independent tests show 78%–83% more calories and up to 400% more fat than advertised.
David Protein argues the testing methods are flawed and cites FDA rules allowing a 20% margin of error.
The controversy centers on the ingredient EPG, which the company says helps maintain a low calorie count.

History

Historical Context

The Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA), enacted on November 8, 1990, mandated accurate nutritional labeling for most food products, empowering the FDA to regulate nutrient claims. Despite these regulations, a recent lawsuit against Linus Technology reveals ongoing disputes over nutritional accuracy, with claims that their protein bars contain 78%–83% more calories than advertised, highlighting the need for transparency in food labeling.

1 of 2

Story summary

A class-action lawsuit accuses Linus Technology, parent of David Protein, of misrepresenting nutritional information on its high-protein bars.
Plaintiffs allege that independent tests show 78%–83% more calories and up to 400% more fat than advertised.
David Protein argues the testing methods are flawed and cites FDA rules allowing a 20% margin of error.
The controversy centers on the ingredient EPG, which the company says helps maintain a low calorie count.

1 / 2