Story perspectives

High Court Rules Against Jakštys Over Smart Glasses Deceit

3/14/2026

Summary

Story summary

In London, the High Court judge Raquel Agnello ruled Jakštys provided unreliable evidence while wearing smart glasses connected to his mobile phone.
The judge found Jakštys untruthful denying the glasses' use and paused before answering.
During cross-examination, interference revealed the smart glasses and a mobile phone broadcasting a voice.
The judge rejected Jakštys' claim that the voice came from ChatGPT, and the defendants won with an indemnity costs order.

1 of 1

Story summary

In London, the High Court judge Raquel Agnello ruled Jakštys provided unreliable evidence while wearing smart glasses connected to his mobile phone.
The judge found Jakštys untruthful denying the glasses' use and paused before answering.
During cross-examination, interference revealed the smart glasses and a mobile phone broadcasting a voice.
The judge rejected Jakštys' claim that the voice came from ChatGPT, and the defendants won with an indemnity costs order.