Full Breakdown
Trump Administration Proposes Dismantling National Center for Atmospheric Research
3/14/2026, 9:25:08 PM
Overview of the Proposal
The Trump administration is considering a plan to dismantle the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), a prominent climate and weather research institution located in Boulder, Colorado. This proposal includes transferring NCAR's supercomputer, known as Derecho, to the University of Wyoming, relocating its space weather lab to a private company, and selling its property. The initiative has drawn significant criticism from scientists and local officials who argue that it would undermine vital research capabilities essential for understanding climate change and forecasting extreme weather events.
Importance of NCAR
Founded in 1960 and operated by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, NCAR plays a crucial role in advancing scientific knowledge related to weather and climate. The center employs approximately 830 staff members and is known for its sophisticated computer models and research aircraft, which are integral to predicting natural disasters and supporting emergency planning. Critics assert that dismantling NCAR would leave communities less prepared for natural disasters, as its research underpins many emergency response strategies.
Official Statements & Responses
Russell Vought, the White House budget director, has publicly criticized NCAR, labeling it "one of the largest sources of climate alarmism in the country." This sentiment reflects a broader skepticism within the administration regarding climate science. In response to the proposed changes, Colorado Governor Jared Polis stated, “Breaking up the institution would have detrimental impacts. People evacuate more quickly and safely from fires because of NCAR.” Additionally, Scott Rayder, CEO of Lynker, emphasized the importance of keeping NCAR's functions intact, stating, “These are critical functions. If you are going to break them up, don't let them go.”
Criticism & Opposition
The proposal has faced backlash from various stakeholders, including scientists and local officials. Carlos Javier Martinez, Chief Climate Scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists, expressed concerns about the rushed nature of the proposal and questioned the sincerity of the public comment period. Critics argue that the public has not been given adequate opportunity to engage with the decision-making process, raising alarms about transparency and accountability.
Timeline of Events
- December 2025: Russell Vought criticizes NCAR on social media.
- March 13, 2026: Deadline for proposals from interested institutions and public comments to the National Science Foundation regarding NCAR's future.
What's Next
The National Science Foundation is set to review the proposals and public comments submitted by the March 13 deadline. The outcome of this review will determine the future of NCAR and its critical research capabilities.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
While the Trump administration's plans have been outlined, there is a lack of clarity regarding the specific details of the proposals and the extent of public engagement in the decision-making process. Critics have raised concerns about the adequacy of the public comment period, suggesting that it may not reflect a genuine effort to involve stakeholders in the discussion about NCAR's future.
