Full Breakdown
Kapoor Family Challenges Property Claim in Madras High Court
3/18/2026, 7:03:26 AM
Legal Dispute Over A. Sridevi's Property
Film producer Boney Kapoor, along with his daughters Janhvi Kapoor and Khushi Kapoor, has initiated legal proceedings in the Madras High Court concerning a civil suit related to a 4.7-acre property in Chennai, originally purchased by the late actress A. Sridevi in 1988. The case arises from a claim made by Chandrabanu and her children, M.C. Sivakami and M.C. Natarajan, who assert that they are entitled to a share of the property. The Kapoor family contends that the marriage of Chandrabanu to M.C. Chandrasekaran, the original owner of the land, was invalid due to bigamy, as it occurred while he was still married to another woman.
Justice T.V. Thamilselvi has scheduled a hearing for the Kapoor family's civil revision petition on March 26, 2026, and has temporarily stayed all proceedings in the district court. The Kapoor family argues that they have possessed the property for 38 years and questions the legitimacy of the plaintiffs' claims, which they believe are based on a misrepresentation of facts.
Plaintiffs' Allegations
The plaintiffs, Chandrabanu, Sivakami, and Natarajan, counter the Kapoor family's assertions by claiming that the 1988 sale deeds are illegal and that the Kapoor family obtained a 'patta'—a document proving land ownership—through fraudulent means in 2023. They argue that they only became aware of the property and the alleged illegal transactions in 2023, prompting them to file their suit in 2025. The additional district court dismissed the Kapoor family's plea to reject the plaint on December 1, 2025, stating that the matter could only be resolved through a full trial.
Criticism & Opposition
The Kapoor family has criticized the plaintiffs for not disclosing the circumstances surrounding Chandrabanu's marriage, which they claim undermines the legitimacy of their case. They assert that the plaintiffs' failure to present a complete genealogy tree constitutes an attempt to mislead the court. Conversely, the plaintiffs argue that the Kapoor family lacks both legal and moral authority to question their familial relationships.
Official Statements & Responses
The Kapoor family maintains that the civil suit filed in 2025 is unfounded, given that no disputes were raised during the lifetime of Chandrasekaran, who passed away in 1995. They emphasize their long-standing possession of the property and the absence of any prior claims against it.
What's Next
The upcoming hearing on March 26, 2026, will be pivotal in determining the future of the property dispute. Both parties are expected to present their cases, with the court's decision potentially impacting the ownership status of the land in question.
