Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Mediahuis Suspends Journalist Over AI-Generated Quotes

3/21/2026, 7:10:27 AM

Overview of the Incident

Peter Vandermeersch, a senior journalist and former chief executive of Mediahuis Ireland, has been suspended after admitting to using artificial intelligence (AI) tools to generate inaccurate quotes in his writings. Vandermeersch utilized AI platforms such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google Notebook to summarize reports, which led to the publication of false statements attributed to various individuals. The issue was uncovered by an investigation conducted by NRC, a Mediahuis publication, which found that 15 out of 53 blog posts written by Vandermeersch contained unverifiable quotes.

Background & Context

Vandermeersch, who previously served as editor-in-chief at NRC for nine years, took on the role of Fellow for "Journalism and Society" at Mediahuis five months prior to his suspension. His tenure at Mediahuis Ireland spanned from 2019 to 2025, during which he oversaw the Irish Independent and Sunday Independent. The suspension comes amid increasing scrutiny over the ethical use of AI in journalism, particularly concerning the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated content.

Key Findings from the Investigation

The NRC investigation revealed that Vandermeersch published “dozens” of fictitious quotes, with seven individuals confirming they did not make the statements attributed to them. The analysis indicated that Vandermeersch had failed to verify the accuracy of the AI-generated content before publication. In his Substack post titled “I am admitting my mistake,” Vandermeersch acknowledged his error, stating, “I wrongly put words into people’s mouths, when I should have presented them as paraphrases.”

Official Statements & Responses

Gert Ysebaert, CEO of Mediahuis, emphasized the company's commitment to reliable journalism, stating, “At Mediahuis, we apply strict rules for the use of AI, where diligence, human oversight, and transparency are essential.” He further noted that the failure to adhere to these principles was contrary to the standards upheld by the organization. Vandermeersch expressed regret for his actions, admitting, “It is particularly painful that I made precisely the mistake I have repeatedly warned colleagues about.”

Criticism & Opposition

The incident has sparked discussions about the ethical implications of using AI in journalism. Critics argue that reliance on AI tools without proper verification can undermine journalistic integrity. Vandermeersch himself recognized the risks, stating, “These language models are so good that they produce irresistible quotes you are tempted to use as an author. Of course, I should have verified them.”

What's Next

As Mediahuis reviews the situation, Vandermeersch's articles have been removed from the Irish Independent website. The company is expected to reinforce its guidelines regarding AI usage in journalism to prevent similar incidents in the future. The case highlights the ongoing challenges faced by media organizations in balancing technological advancements with the need for accuracy and accountability in reporting.