Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Global Energy Crisis Triggered by Iran Conflict

3/22/2026, 3:36:26 AM

Overview of the Energy Disruption

The ongoing conflict in the Middle East, particularly involving Iran, has led to what the International Energy Agency (IEA) describes as the worst global energy disruption in history. Since the onset of airstrikes by the United States and Israel on February 28, 2023, the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz has halted the passage of approximately 20 percent of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG). This disruption has resulted in a significant reduction of global oil supply, with around 400 million barrels—equivalent to four days of world supply—removed from the market, causing oil prices to surge over 50 percent, reaching more than $110 per barrel.

Economic and Social Impacts

The energy crisis has triggered soaring prices for transport fuels, impacting consumers and businesses globally. Countries such as Thailand and Bangladesh have implemented measures to conserve energy, including suspending overseas trips and closing universities. In Europe, jet fuel prices have skyrocketed to around $220 per barrel, while retail petrol prices in the United States have increased by over a dollar per gallon since the conflict began. The IEA has proposed various demand-side strategies to mitigate the crisis, including telecommuting and reducing speed limits on highways.

Fertilizer and Food Supply Threats

The conflict has also severely disrupted global fertilizer markets, with about one-third of global trade in fertilizers typically passing through the Strait of Hormuz now stalled. Prices for nitrogen-based fertilizers, such as urea, have risen by 30 to 40 percent. This disruption poses a significant threat to food supplies, as half of the world's food production relies on fertilizers, which can account for up to half the cost of grain production. If the conflict persists, experts warn that global food supplies could face severe challenges.

Official Statements and Responses

The IEA has emphasized that relying solely on supply-side measures will not stabilize markets. Fatih Birol, the agency's executive director, noted that both policymakers and markets may be underestimating the crisis's severity. The IEA has called for immediate collective action across households, transport, and industry to manage the disruption effectively.

Criticism and Opposition

Critics argue that the measures proposed by the IEA may be insufficient given the scale of the crisis. Analysts, including J.P. Morgan's Natasha Kaneva, have stated that reducing demand is the only viable solution when supplies are critically low. The political ramifications of rising energy prices have also become a liability for U.S. President Donald Trump, who has faced challenges in justifying the war to the American public.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “You’re not going to conserve your way around this. What it’s going to translate to are price rises high enough that people stop consuming,” — Dan Pickering, Chief Investment Officer, Pickering Energy Partners
  • “The breadth of what is at risk here in fuels, chemicals, LNG and fertiliser inputs is what makes this moment qualitatively different from previous episodes of Gulf tension,” — Aditya Saraswat, Senior Vice President, Rystad Energy
  • “We, again, call for an immediate stop to the targeting of energy facilities and for the resumption of cargo traffic through the Strait of Hormuz as fertilisers, petrochemicals for the pharmaceutical industry, oil, grain and gas are all critical to our existence,” — Menelaos Ydreos, Secretary-General, International Gas Union

What's Next

As the conflict continues, the IEA warns that recovery of standard oil and gas supplies could take six months or more. The agency's recommendations for immediate action underscore the urgency of addressing the crisis to stabilize markets and prevent further economic fallout.