Full Breakdown
Shalom Baranes Takes on Controversial White House Ballroom Project
3/24/2026, 9:39:14 PM
Architect's Decision Raises Eyebrows
Shalom Baranes, a prominent architect known for his extensive work in Washington, D.C., has agreed to oversee the construction of a new ballroom at the White House, a decision that has perplexed many in the architectural community. The $400 million project, which will add a 90,000-square-foot ballroom to the historic residence, has drawn significant criticism from preservationists and fellow architects alike. Baranes, 75, is recognized for his previous high-profile projects, including the renovation of the Pentagon and the Federal Reserve Building. His decision to take on this controversial project has led to questions about his motivations, especially given his history of criticizing President Donald Trump’s administration, particularly its immigration policies.
Background and Context
Baranes was selected for the project after the original architect, James McCrery II, stepped down. The ballroom is intended to provide a larger entertaining space for state dinners and other official events, a need expressed by President Trump. However, the project has faced backlash, including a lawsuit aimed at halting its construction, citing concerns over its impact on the historical integrity of the White House.
Criticism and Opposition
Many in the architectural field have voiced their disapproval of Baranes' involvement in the project. A group of 29 architects sent a letter urging him to decline the job, arguing that the addition would diminish the White House's stature. Preservationists have also expressed their concerns, with Nancy MacWood, a civic leader, stating, “I don’t understand why he would put himself in such a hot seat right now.” Critics argue that the project represents a significant alteration to a national landmark, undermining its historical significance.
Official Statements & Responses
Baranes has remained largely silent about his motivations, citing a nondisclosure agreement with the White House. However, he has reiterated his concerns regarding the Trump administration's policies, stating, “What’s happening now is heartbreaking,” and emphasizing the importance of immigration to the fabric of American society. Supporters within the architectural community, such as Richard Nash Gould, have defended Baranes, suggesting that the project is an interesting challenge for a seasoned architect.
Verbatim Quotes
- “What’s happening now is heartbreaking.” — Shalom Baranes, Architect
- “I don’t understand why he would put himself in such a hot seat right now,” — Nancy MacWood, Preservationist
- “If I had to pick who would do this job, it would be Shalom,” — Richard Nash Gould, Architect
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
While Baranes has faced criticism for his decision, some colleagues argue that his experience makes him well-suited for the project. The architectural community remains divided, with strong opinions on both sides regarding the implications of the ballroom addition.
What's Next
As construction progresses, the project will likely continue to attract scrutiny from preservationists and the public. The outcome of the ongoing lawsuit and public sentiment will play a crucial role in determining the future of the White House ballroom project and its impact on the architectural landscape of Washington, D.C.
