Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Impact of Insurance Instability on Diabetes Management

3/24/2026, 8:01:17 AM

Study Findings on Insurance Churn and Diabetes Control

A recent study published in JAMA Health Forum highlights the detrimental effects of unstable insurance coverage on individuals with type 2 diabetes. Researchers, led by Nathalie Huguet, an associate professor at Oregon Health & Science University, found that low-income adults experiencing insurance "churn"—the cycle of losing and regaining coverage—struggle significantly with blood sugar management. The study analyzed health records of over 39,000 adults treated at community health centers across 20 states, primarily serving low-income populations.

The findings indicate that individuals who lost insurance coverage required more diabetes medications compared to those with consistent coverage. Huguet noted, “Even though they all started at the same baseline, the patients who lost insurance had worse outcomes.” This raises critical questions about the ability of individuals to manage complex diabetes treatment without reliable insurance.

Implications of Medicaid Cuts

The study's results carry serious implications, particularly in light of recent Medicaid cuts and rising insurance premiums attributed to policies under the Trump Administration. Huguet emphasized that many individuals who lose Medicaid coverage do not regain it for extended periods, leading to increased reliance on expensive marketplace plans and unaffordable insulin for many.

Dr. Jennifer DeVoe, another researcher involved in the study, warned that a reduction in Medicaid coverage could strain primary care clinics, making it more challenging to provide adequate care for affected patients. She stated, “We need to increase support to primary care clinics so they can continue to serve their patients and keep the damage of losing insurance to a minimum.”

Consequences of Unstable Coverage

The study also revealed that while serious complications from poorly managed diabetes, such as amputations or kidney failure, were less common in the short term, this may not reflect long-term outcomes. Huguet cautioned that the follow-up period was relatively brief, suggesting that the true impact of insurance loss may manifest over time. “What we’re seeing is an early warning sign. The disease gets harder to manage after insurance loss,” she explained.

Criticism and Concerns

Critics of current healthcare policies argue that the findings underscore a systemic issue within the U.S. healthcare system, where insurance instability can lead to dire health outcomes. The potential for life-changing consequences, such as amputations, not only affects individual patients but also incurs higher costs for the healthcare system as a whole.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Even though they all started at the same baseline, the patients who lost insurance had worse outcomes,” — Nathalie Huguet, Associate Professor, Oregon Health & Science University
  • “We need to increase support to primary care clinics so they can continue to serve their patients and keep the damage of losing insurance to a minimum,” — Dr. Jennifer DeVoe, Professor, Oregon Health & Science University
  • “That can lead to life-changing outcomes, like amputations, and it ultimately costs more for patients and the entire health system.” — Nathalie Huguet, Associate Professor, Oregon Health & Science University

The study serves as a critical reminder of the importance of stable insurance coverage for effective diabetes management and the broader implications of healthcare policy on public health outcomes.