Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Gulf States Reassess Strategies Amid Escalating Conflict with Iran

3/24/2026, 11:48:28 AM

Shifting Perspectives on Military Engagement

Initially, Gulf countries, including the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Qatar, cautioned U.S. President Donald Trump against launching military action against Iran. However, as the conflict escalated, these nations have begun to advocate for continued military strikes against Iran to degrade its military capabilities. Senior officials from these countries expressed a desire for Iran's military power to be sufficiently weakened to mitigate threats to their national security. Despite some frustration with U.S. and Israeli military strategies, the consensus among many Gulf states is that allowing Iran to retain its current military capabilities would be a strategic disaster.

Diverging Views Among Gulf States

While there is a general agreement on the need to diminish Iran's military threat, opinions vary on how to achieve this. The UAE and Saudi Arabia are reportedly considering joining U.S. and Israeli operations against Iran, while Oman has expressed a preference for diplomatic solutions. Officials noted that the ongoing conflict has led to increased regional coordination among Gulf states, as they recognize the interconnectedness of their economies and security. This shift reflects a recalibration of their approach to Iran, balancing dialogue with a more assertive deterrent posture.

Economic Implications of the Conflict

The conflict has had significant economic repercussions, particularly in the energy sector. Iranian missile strikes on critical infrastructure, including Qatar's Ras Laffan gas facility, have disrupted oil and gas production, leading to a spike in global energy prices. Analysts predict that continued attacks could drive oil prices to unprecedented levels, exacerbating economic challenges for both the U.S. and its allies. The Gulf states, heavily reliant on energy exports, are increasingly concerned about the long-term impacts of the conflict on their economies.

Criticism of U.S. Strategy

Critics have pointed to a lack of foresight in U.S. military planning, particularly regarding Iran's retaliatory capabilities. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan highlighted concerns that the conflict could escalate further, with Gulf states warning of potential actions if hostilities continue. The divergence between U.S. and Israeli strategies has raised alarms about the potential for a prolonged conflict, complicating diplomatic efforts for a ceasefire.

Official Statements & Responses

Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi emphasized the need for an early end to hostilities, reflecting a broader sentiment among some Gulf states that diplomacy should remain a priority. Meanwhile, Gulf officials have expressed anger towards Iran for its retaliatory strikes, viewing them as unjustified aggression rather than a response to U.S. and Israeli actions. Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud reiterated the importance of regional stability while signaling that continued attacks could provoke a stronger military response.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Ending the war with Iran still in possession of the tools it is currently using to target the GCC would be a strategic disaster,” — Senior Gulf Official
  • “We want this war to end with Iran stripped of the capabilities to harm its neighbors,” — Senior Gulf Official
  • “The region’s main ask of Tehran continues to be that it should respect their sovereignty.” — Qatari Political Analyst
  • “If the type of attacks we have seen over the past days continue, the oil price would likely go to a hundred and fifty dollars a barrel, and quite possibly to two hundred dollars,” — Simon Flowers, Chairman of Wood Mackenzie

What's Next

As the conflict continues, Gulf states are likely to enhance their military coordination and defense capabilities in anticipation of further Iranian aggression. The evolving dynamics may also lead to a reevaluation of their diplomatic relationships, particularly with the U.S., as they seek to balance security needs with economic stability.