Back to today’s briefing

Story perspectives

Supreme Court Skeptical of Counting Late Mail Votes

3/26/2026

32 3 Full Breakdown

Summary

Story summary

The Supreme Court heard arguments on counting mail votes arriving after Election Day.
The court's conservative majority appeared skeptical about continuing this practice.
Francisco Aguilar, Nevada's secretary of state, urged counties to prepare a plan for clerks.
The Mississippi case allows ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if they arrive within five days.

History

Historical Context

The 2020 Supreme Court ruling on mail-in voting procedures arose amid the COVID-19 pandemic, reflecting a significant shift in electoral practices as 46 states expanded mail voting options. This change echoes historical debates on voting rights, particularly in states like Nevada and Mississippi, and could redefine mail voting regulations, impacting future elections and voter participation across the United States.

1 of 2

Story summary

The Supreme Court heard arguments on counting mail votes arriving after Election Day.
The court's conservative majority appeared skeptical about continuing this practice.
Francisco Aguilar, Nevada's secretary of state, urged counties to prepare a plan for clerks.
The Mississippi case allows ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if they arrive within five days.

1 / 2