Story perspectives

DoD Revises Media Policy After Court Ruling, Appeals Decision

3/26/2026

Center

DoD Revises Credentialing

The U.S. Department of Defense revised its media credentialing policy after a federal judge ruled the prior rules violated the First and Fifth Amendments, in a case brought by The New York Times.
The judge found the policy aimed to exclude certain journalists and granted officials excessive discretion over press access.
The DoD will appeal and keep some restrictions, including escorting journalists inside the building.

Left

Anthropic Challenges Pentagon

Anthropic challenged the Pentagon's designation of it as a national security supply chain risk in federal court.
The designation by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth bars contractors from using Anthropic's AI technology because it refuses to allow unrestricted applications.
Anthropic says the action violates its First Amendment rights and is retaliatory.
Legal experts, including Senator Elizabeth Warren, criticized the Pentagon's stance.
Judge Rita Lin expressed concerns about the government's legality.

History

Historical Context

The 1971 Supreme Court ruling in New York Times Co. v. United States reinforced press freedom by prohibiting prior restraint, a pivotal moment in First Amendment jurisprudence. This decision, alongside ongoing legal disputes like those involving Anthropic, highlights the enduring tension between national security and free expression, echoing historical struggles for government transparency and accountability in the United States.

1 of 3

DoD Revises Credentialing

The U.S. Department of Defense revised its media credentialing policy after a federal judge ruled the prior rules violated the First and Fifth Amendments, in a case brought by The New York Times.
The judge found the policy aimed to exclude certain journalists and granted officials excessive discretion over press access.
The DoD will appeal and keep some restrictions, including escorting journalists inside the building.

1 / 3