South Dakota Enacts Proof of Citizenship Law for Voter Registration

On March 26, 2026, South Dakota Governor Larry Rhoden signed a bill requiring new voters to prove their United States citizenship to participate in state and local elections. This law, which does not affect individuals already registered to vote, aligns with a broader national trend among Republican-led states to implement stricter voting regulations. Governor Rhoden stated, “This bill ensures only citizens vote in state elections, keeping our elections safe and secure.”

New York Times

The introduction of this law comes amid ongoing discussions at the federal level, particularly surrounding the SAVE America Act, which aims to establish stringent national voter registration and identification requirements. However, this federal legislation has faced significant opposition in the Senate, primarily from Democratic lawmakers. South Dakota's move reflects a growing momentum among Republican states to tighten voting rules, despite the rarity of noncitizen voting, which is already illegal.

New York Times

• Larry Rhoden: Governor of South Dakota, who signed the bill and is currently seeking election for a full term.

New York Times

• Kristi Noem: Former Governor of South Dakota, now serving as the Secretary of Homeland Security under President Donald Trump.

New York Times

• Erik Muckey: Democratic State Representative who opposed the bill, arguing that it is unnecessary since noncitizens cannot vote in South Dakota.

New York Times

Opponents of the proof of citizenship requirement, including State Representative Erik Muckey, have criticized the legislation as a solution in search of a problem. Muckey emphasized that the law could disenfranchise eligible voters more than it would prevent ineligible ones from voting. Critics argue that such measures disproportionately affect marginalized communities and create unnecessary barriers to voting.

New York Times

Governor Rhoden defended the law as a necessary step to ensure election integrity, while critics have pointed out that the legislation may lead to disenfranchisement. Muckey's dissent highlights the concerns regarding the potential impact on voter participation, stating, “Noncitizens cannot vote in South Dakota — this bill is wholly unnecessary.”

New York Times

While proponents of the law assert that it will enhance election security, critics maintain that the actual incidence of noncitizen voting is minimal. The debate continues over the necessity and implications of such legislation, with no consensus on whether it effectively addresses any significant issue.

New York Times

As South Dakota implements this new law, its effects on voter turnout and participation will be closely monitored, particularly in the upcoming elections. The ongoing national conversation about voting rights and regulations is likely to influence future legislative actions in South Dakota and beyond.

New York Times