Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Divisions Emerge at CPAC Over Trump's War in Iran

3/29/2026, 7:45:53 PM

The Core Event: A Divided Republican Base

The Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) held in Grapevine, Texas, has highlighted significant divisions within the Republican Party regarding President Donald Trump's ongoing military campaign in Iran. As the conflict enters its fifth week, the absence of Trump—who did not attend for the first time in a decade—has left attendees grappling with the implications of a war that contradicts his "America First" rhetoric.

Background & Context: The War's Impact on Trump’s Legacy

The military action against Iran, which began with U.S.-Israeli strikes in late February, has raised concerns among Trump's supporters, particularly regarding its economic ramifications. Gas prices have surged, and public disapproval of the war has grown, with a recent poll indicating that 59% of Americans view the military action as excessive. This backdrop sets the stage for the discussions at CPAC, where the potential for a prolonged conflict threatens to fracture Trump's coalition ahead of the midterm elections.

Generational Divide: Young vs. Older Conservatives

A stark generational divide emerged at CPAC, with younger attendees expressing disappointment over Trump's military actions. Many voiced feelings of betrayal, citing his previous promises to avoid foreign entanglements. For instance, 25-year-old Benjamin Williams remarked, “We did not want to see more wars. We wanted actual America-first policies.” In contrast, older conservatives largely supported the war, framing it as a necessary response to long-standing threats from Iran. Seventy-year-old Joe Ropar stated, “I don’t believe he started a new war. He was acting in response to a 40-year-old war by Iran.”

Key Figures & Voices: Support and Skepticism

Several prominent figures at CPAC voiced their opinions on the war. Former Rep. Matt Gaetz cautioned against a ground invasion, arguing it would make the U.S. “poorer and less safe.” He emphasized the need for diplomatic solutions, stating, “I want President Trump to have every diplomatic tool at his disposal.” Conversely, former Trump advisor Steve Bannon urged attendees to support the military campaign, warning that the stakes are high for future generations.

Official Statements & Responses: Party Leadership's Stance

CPAC Chairman Matt Schlapp acknowledged the divisions within the party, emphasizing the need for unity as the midterms approach. He stated, “Any consensus is still to be determined. I think people trust President Trump, so I don’t think there’s been any shaking of his support.” However, the mixed reactions from attendees suggest that the war could become a liability for the GOP if it continues to escalate.

Criticism & Opposition: Voices of Dissent

Despite the overall support for Trump, dissenting voices were present at CPAC. Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater, warned of the potential consequences of a ground invasion, predicting “imagery of burning American warships.” This sentiment was echoed by younger conservatives who fear the implications of a draft and the long-term effects of military engagement.

What's Next: Implications for the GOP

As the war in Iran unfolds, the Republican Party faces critical decisions that could shape its future. The internal rifts highlighted at CPAC may influence the party's strategy heading into the midterm elections, where maintaining unity will be essential to counter Democratic gains. With Trump's approval ratings slipping and the economic impact of the war becoming more pronounced, the GOP must navigate these challenges carefully to preserve its coalition.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “But a ground invasion of Iran will make our country poorer and less safe.” — Matt Gaetz, Former Congressman
  • “you will see imagery of burning American warships in the next couple of weeks. And I don’t think people are really prepared for that.” — Erik Prince, Founder of Blackwater
  • “We did not want to see more wars. We wanted actual America-first policies, and Trump was very explicit about that,” — Benjamin Williams, Young Americans for Liberty
  • “I don’t believe he started a new war. He was acting in response to a 40-year-old war by Iran,” — Joe Ropar, Retired Defense Contractor

The ongoing conflict in Iran and its ramifications for Trump's presidency and the Republican Party remain a focal point of concern as the nation approaches a pivotal election year.