Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Al Hilal Challenges RS Berkane Over Player Eligibility in CAF Champions League

3/31/2026, 12:44:26 AM

Controversy Over Player Suspension

Al Hilal Omdurman has formally accused RS Berkane of fielding an ineligible player, Hamza El Moussaoui, during their CAF Champions League quarterfinal matches. The Sudanese club claims that El Moussaoui was under a 30-day suspension for a doping violation when he participated in the games. According to Al Hilal, the player tested positive for a banned substance as per the World Anti-Doping Agency's (WADA) regulations after a match against Pyramids FC. The club asserts that the suspension was confirmed by the Confederation of African Football (CAF) just two days before the first leg on March 15, where the teams drew 1-1 in Morocco.

Allegations of Procedural Violations

Al Hilal contends that the suspension was unexpectedly lifted on match day, allowing El Moussaoui to play. They argue that this decision constitutes a "serious violation of the integrity and balance of the competition." El Moussaoui's involvement was pivotal, as he won a penalty that led to Berkane's equalizer in the first leg. In the subsequent second leg on March 22, Al Hilal lost 1-0, resulting in Berkane's advancement in the tournament. The Sudanese club has submitted comprehensive evidence to CAF to support their claims and has expressed dissatisfaction with the officiating decisions during the matches, including the disallowance of a goal by Adama Coulibaly.

Official Statements & Responses

In their official statement, Al Hilal emphasized their commitment to fair play and the integrity of African competitions. They noted that they had submitted two official protests regarding El Moussaoui's eligibility before the matches, which were delivered to match officials. The club has also requested to participate in the relevant disciplinary proceedings initiated by CAF.

Criticism & Opposition

Critics of Al Hilal's complaint may argue that the lifting of El Moussaoui's suspension could have been justified under specific circumstances not disclosed publicly. However, the lack of clarity surrounding the decision has raised concerns about governance and procedural consistency within CAF.

What's Next

CAF has initiated an investigation into the eligibility complaint, with a hearing scheduled for March 31. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for both clubs involved and may set a precedent regarding the enforcement of disciplinary rulings in African football.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “blatant violation of the integrity of the competition” — Al Hilal Official Statement
  • “Furthermore, it clarified that it is taking all necessary steps to ensure fairness and maintain the integrity of competition in African tournaments.” — Al Hilal Official Statement

The unfolding situation highlights the critical need for transparency and consistency in the governance of African football, as stakeholders await CAF's ruling on this contentious issue.